Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS414_2021 Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS414_2021 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All C_TS414_2021 Questions]

For which of the following QM elements can the short text be maintained in only one language

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Allene
3 months ago
I believe it could also be Code group and code, as they are closely related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
3 months ago
I agree with Leota, Inspection Plan header makes sense because it's the main element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
3 months ago
B. Inspection Method seems like the logical choice, as the instructions can be clearly conveyed in a single language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
3 months ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I hope the exam doesn't have too many of these language-related conundrums!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
I think the short text can be maintained in only one language for Inspection Plan header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
3 months ago
I believe it could also be Code group and code, as they are closely related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
3 months ago
A. MIC, or Material Identification Code, is a globally recognized standard, so it should be maintainable in a single language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
3 months ago
D. The Inspection Plan header seems to be the most straightforward option where the text can be maintained in one language.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
3 months ago
That makes sense. It would be easier to manage and keep consistent that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
3 months ago
Yes, it definitely makes sense to keep the short text in one language for the Inspection Plan header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
3 months ago
I agree, the Inspection Plan header is the best option for maintaining text in one language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
3 months ago
Yes, I agree. It seems like the most logical choice out of the options given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I think the short text can be maintained in one language for the Inspection Plan header.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josue
4 months ago
I agree with Sylvia, Inspection Plan header makes sense because it's the main element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
I think the answer is C. The code group and code are usually standardized and can be maintained in a single language.
upvoted 0 times
Corrie
2 months ago
I believe it's C) Code group and code, they are usually standardized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) MIC might also have a short text in one language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
3 months ago
I think it's D, the Inspection Plan header can also have a short text in one language.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I agree, the code group and code can be maintained in only one language.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
I think the short text can be maintained in only one language for Inspection Plan header.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77