Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS414_2023 Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS414_2023 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All C_TS414_2023 Questions]

You post a goods receipt for a purchasing document and inspection type 01 is active in the material master. The supplier has not provided the mandatory quality certificate. Which of the following process steps Is possible? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shawana
3 months ago
Hmm, this one's a bit tricky. I'd go with A and C, just to be on the safe side. Gotta cover all our bases, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
3 months ago
You know, this reminds me of that time I had to deal with a supplier who couldn't even find their own socks, let alone a quality certificate. Classic!
upvoted 0 times
Noelia
2 months ago
B) Recording of inspection results
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
2 months ago
B) iS Recording of inspection results
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
2 months ago
A) Confirmation of certificate receipt after usage decision
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
2 months ago
A) Confirmation of certificate receipt after usage decision
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
3 months ago
I'm not sure about D, recording defects seems unrelated to the missing quality certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
3 months ago
I agree with Shaunna, A and C make sense because they involve the certificate receipt and usage decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
3 months ago
Oh man, this is a weird scenario. I'd say B and D are the safest bet here. Gotta document those defects just in case.
upvoted 0 times
Dell
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, and D is important too, we should definitely document any defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
3 months ago
User 1: I think B is a good option, we need to record the inspection results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daryl
4 months ago
Ha, this is a classic one! I'd go with B and C - can't forget to record those inspection results before posting the usage call.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
3 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
3 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
4 months ago
Ah, I bet A and C are the right choices. Gotta confirm that certificate receipt before you can make the usage decision.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
3 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to follow the process steps correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
3 months ago
User 1: I think A and C are correct too. You need to confirm the certificate receipt before making the usage decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
4 months ago
This one's tricky, but I think B and D are the way to go. Gotta record those defects if the supplier didn't provide the certificate!
upvoted 0 times
Anisha
4 months ago
Yes, it's crucial to document any issues with the goods received when the quality certificate is missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
4 months ago
I agree, recording the inspection results and defects is important in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaunna
4 months ago
I think the possible process steps are A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd say B and C are the correct answers here. Can't post the usage decision without the inspection results, right?
upvoted 0 times
Julio
3 months ago
India: Exactly, that's why C is also a possible process step.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
3 months ago
User 2: I agree, and then you can post the usage decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
4 months ago
User 1: I think B is correct, you need to record the inspection results first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77