Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TS422_2023 Topic 4 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2023 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 4
[All C_TS422_2023 Questions]

How would you define pegging in the context of Advanced Planning?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Pegging is a term used in Advanced Planning to describe the relationship between the receipt and the issue elements of a product within a location. Receipt elements are planning elements that increase the stock of a product, such as production orders, purchase orders, or stock transfers. Issue elements are planning elements that reduce the stock of a product, such as sales orders, planned independent requirements, or reservations. Pegging links the receipt and issue elements according to the bill-of-material structure of all related products and represents the material flow through all levels of production. Pegging enables the system to identify and display quantity and date/time problems, such as shortages or delays, and to forward scheduling changes to other dependent elements.Pegging also forms the basis for the availability check and the capacity check in Advanced Planning12.


1: SAP Help Portal: Pegging

2: SAP S/4HANA Production Planning and Manufacturing Certification Guide, Chapter 4: Advanced Planning

by King at Jul 13, 2024, 09:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TS422_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Odette
4 months ago
Pegging? I thought that was something else entirely... Anyway, I'm just gonna go with D and hope for the best. Overstock situations, here I come!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
4 months ago
Pegging in Advanced Planning? Sounds like a real headache. But I'm gonna go with A - that network structure coverage thing sounds like it could be the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Dortha
2 months ago
It's good to consider different viewpoints. I think I'll go with option C as well, it makes sense to verify shortages in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
3 months ago
Hmm, interesting perspectives. I still think pegging is about the network structure coverage, so I'm sticking with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
3 months ago
I see your point, but I believe pegging is more about verifying material or capacity shortages in the network. Option C seems like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
3 months ago
I think pegging in Advanced Planning is all about evaluating the relationship between receipt and issue elements. So, I would choose option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
4 months ago
Pegging, huh? I'm feeling like a solid B on this one. Gotta love that relationship between the receipt and issue elements. Keeps things nice and tidy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
4 months ago
Hmm, pegging. Doesn't that sound like something you'd do with a hammock? Anyway, I think C is the way to go here. Gotta check for those material and capacity shortages, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Frederick
4 months ago
Definitely, C is the best option for pegging. We can't afford to have any material or capacity shortages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
4 months ago
Yeah, pegging is all about checking for shortages in the network after production planning. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
4 months ago
I agree, C is definitely the right choice. We need to make sure we don't have any shortages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
4 months ago
I believe option C is the right answer then, as it mentions shortages in the network after production planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think pegging is more about verifying material or capacity shortages in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
4 months ago
Ah, pegging in Advanced Planning. Sounds like a tricky one. I'm going to go with option B - it just makes the most sense to me in terms of the bill-of-material structure.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
3 months ago
Yeah, it's all about the bill-of-material structure when it comes to pegging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
3 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
Definitely, it helps in understanding the relationship between receipt and issue elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
4 months ago
I think pegging in Advanced Planning is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
5 months ago
I agree with Carmelina, option B seems to be the correct definition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
5 months ago
I think pegging in Advanced Planning is about evaluating the relationship between receipt and issue elements.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77