Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS452_2022 Topic 4 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS452_2022 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 4
[All C_TS452_2022 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hui
3 months ago
I think both A) and C) are important, as they both play a role in enabling partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
3 months ago
But assigning a partner schema to relevant arrangement types is essential for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
3 months ago
I think both A) and C) are important, as they both play a role in enabling partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
3 months ago
But assigning a partner schema to relevant arrangement types is essential for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
4 months ago
I'm going with C. Assigning partner schemas is important, but defining the allowed roles per account group seems like the key enabler for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
Jodi
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C makes the most sense. It's about setting up the roles for each account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
3 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. It sets the foundation for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
3 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. It's all about defining the roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lina
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer had a field day coming up with that question. 'Partner role detarmraton'? Sounds like a made-up term straight out of a corporate buzzword bingo game.
upvoted 0 times
Lisbeth
2 months ago
I know right, it's like they're trying to confuse us with all these fancy terms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
2 months ago
D) Define permissible partner roles per document type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
3 months ago
C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabella
3 months ago
A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
3 months ago
C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thurman
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
4 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, but I'm not sure it's a prerequisite. Defining roles per document type seems more like a secondary step.
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
4 months ago
C) Define permissible partner roles per account group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
4 months ago
B) Assign a partner schema to relevant account groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
4 months ago
A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Defining permissible partner roles per account group seems like a logical prerequisite for partner role determination in purchasing.
upvoted 0 times
Roxane
3 months ago
Yes, assigning a partner schema to relevant arrangement types is important for partner role determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
3 months ago
Oh, I see. That makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 months ago
I believe it is actually A) Assign a partner schema to relevant arrangement types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77