New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_WZADM_01 Topic 5 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_WZADM_01 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 5
[All C_WZADM_01 Questions]

How can Launchpad shell plugins be deployed to SAP Build Work Zone?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is C. Automated deployment from SAP Business Application Studio into the SAP BTP subaccount HTMLS application section.

Launchpad shell plugins are typically developed in SAP Business Application Studio (formerly known as SAP Web IDE Full-Stack) using SAPUI5 or Fiori elements. Once the plugin is developed, it needs to be deployed to SAP Build Work Zone, which is a cloud-based tool for creating and prototyping Fiori apps.

To deploy a Launchpad shell plugin to SAP Build Work Zone, the recommended approach is to use the automated deployment feature in SAP Business Application Studio. This involves configuring the deployment settings in the project's deployment configuration file and then using the Deploy to SAP BTP command in the IDE to deploy the plugin directly to the SAP BTP subaccount HTMLS application section, which is the target environment for SAP Build Work Zone.

Directly uploading the plugin to the DWS administration console (option D) is not a recommended approach since it does not leverage the benefits of automated deployment and may require manual configuration steps. Uploading the plugin to the HTMLS application section without using the automated deployment feature (option B) may also be possible, but it is not the recommended approach since it may require additional manual configuration steps.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jesse
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the DWS console is about as intuitive as a rocket launch control panel. C is my pick!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
5 months ago
I'm going with D. Uploading directly to the DWS console seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
5 months ago
C is the way to go. Automated deployment from the Studio is probably the easiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
6 months ago
B looks good to me. Uploading directly to the HTMLS section is a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Emily
4 months ago
Yeah, I think uploading directly to the HTMLS section is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
5 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the easiest way to deploy the plugins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bo
6 months ago
Not sure, B doesn't sound very plausible to me. Anyone else think so?
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. Automated deployment from SAP Business Application Studio sounds efficient for enterprise solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
6 months ago
Could be, but D also seems possible. Direct upload into the DWS admin console might be simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
6 months ago
I think the correct response is C. It mentions automated deployment which makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
7 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. Deploying from the Studio directly to the subaccount makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Patti
5 months ago
I think so too. It would streamline the process and make it easier to manage the plugins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I believe C is the best option, automated deployment from the Studio into the SAP BTP subaccount HTMLS application section.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreen
5 months ago
I think A might also work, automated deployment from the Studio into the DWS administration console.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
6 months ago
I agree, deploying directly from the Studio to the subaccount is the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
6 months ago
I agree, deploying directly from the Studio to the subaccount seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
6 months ago
Yeah, it definitely streamlines the process and makes deployment easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
I agree, deploying directly from the Studio to the subaccount seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gianna
7 months ago
Yeah, a bit confusing, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
7 months ago
Did anyone understand the question about Launchpad shell plugins deployment?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77