Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam E_BW4HANA211 Topic 3 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's E_BW4HANA211 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 3
[All E_BW4HANA211 Questions]

What do the Remote Conversion approach and the Shell Conversion approach have in common? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nobuko
4 months ago
Correct. Both approaches do not involve uninstalling the unsupported BW Add-ons as the first activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
4 months ago
I think the Remote Conversion approach and Shell Conversion approach are like distant cousins - they may look different, but they're still part of the same family. A, B, and C are the family resemblance.
upvoted 0 times
Peggy
3 months ago
C) Both approaches result in a SAP BW/4HANA system which has a new system ID
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
4 months ago
B) Both approaches convert unsupported object types during import into the new SAP BW/4HANA system
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
4 months ago
A) Both approaches uninstall the unsupported BW Add-ons from the sending BW system as the first activity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mendy
4 months ago
So, they don't uninstall the unsupported BW Add-ons as the first activity, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
5 months ago
I agree with Lazaro. Another common aspect is that they both require the SAP BW/4HANA Starter Add-on to be installed on the sending system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
5 months ago
I believe that's one of the similarities. They also both result in a new system ID being assigned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
5 months ago
Yeah, they both involve converting unsupported object types during import into the new system, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
5 months ago
I think the Remote Conversion and Shell Conversion approaches are quite similar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with those last two options. But A, B, and C are spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
5 months ago
Definitely A, B, and C. Those are the key similarities between the two approaches. I'm not sure about D and E though.
upvoted 0 times
Roxanne
4 months ago
I think you're right, D and E might not be similarities between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
4 months ago
I agree, A, B, and C are definitely common between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
4 months ago
Yeah, D and E seem to be more specific requirements for each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
4 months ago
I agree, A, B, and C are definitely common between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
4 months ago
Yeah, D and E seem to be more specific requirements for each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
5 months ago
I agree, A, B, and C are definitely common between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karina
5 months ago
That makes sense. So, it seems like options A, B, and C could be the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
5 months ago
I agree with you both. Another common point might be that they both result in a new SAP BW/4HANA system with a new system ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
5 months ago
A, B, and C are correct. Both approaches deal with unsupported objects and result in a new system ID. D and E are not common between the two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
Yong
5 months ago
C) Both approaches result in a SAP BW/4HANA system which has a new system ID
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
5 months ago
B) Both approaches convert unsupported object types during import into the new SAP BW/4HANA system
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
A) Both approaches uninstall the unsupported BW Add-ons from the sending BW system as the first activity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
6 months ago
Yes, I believe two of the correct answers are that they both uninstall unsupported BW Add-ons and convert unsupported object types during import.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
6 months ago
I think the Remote Conversion and Shell Conversion approaches both have something in common.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77