Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam E_S4HCON2023 Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's E_S4HCON2023 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All E_S4HCON2023 Questions]

During the configuration of the DMO for SUM, which Migration Parameter selection is NOT possible for an inplace migration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vesta
3 months ago
This question is making my head spin like a DMO in an inplace migration. Can we get a lifeline or something?
upvoted 0 times
Letha
2 months ago
C) Table count verification
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
2 months ago
B) Migration repetition option
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
2 months ago
A) DMO with system move
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fernanda
3 months ago
Wait, we're supposed to pick the one that's not possible? In that case, I'm going with Option A. DMO with system move? Definitely not happening for an inplace migration!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Gotta make sure those table contents are on point, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure none of these options are actually possible for an inplace migration. This question is just trying to trick us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
3 months ago
Option B sounds like a great choice for an inplace migration. Who doesn't love a little repetition, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Talia
2 months ago
C) Table count verification
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 months ago
B) Migration repetition option
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
2 months ago
A) DMO with system move
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is A) DMO with system move. Who would want to move the entire system during an in-place migration? That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
2 months ago
Definitely, it's better to avoid unnecessary complications during the migration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
Yeah, it's risky to move the entire system during an in-place migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
2 months ago
I think you're right, A) DMO with system move doesn't make sense for an in-place migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
2 months ago
User1: Definitely, it's safer to stick with options that don't involve system moves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. It's better to avoid moving the entire system if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
3 months ago
User1: I think you're right, A) DMO with system move sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
3 months ago
I think you're both mistaken. The correct answer is D) Table contents compare because it involves comparing data which is not supported in an inplace migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
4 months ago
But the documentation clearly states that option B is not possible for an inplace migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Table count verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
4 months ago
I think the answer is B) Migration repetition option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with D) Table contents compare. Comparing the actual data doesn't make sense for an in-place migration.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
3 months ago
Yeah, it's more about moving the system without changing the data, so table count verification would be more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
3 months ago
I think you're right, D) Table contents compare doesn't seem possible for an in-place migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arminda
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's C) Table count verification. That's not possible for an in-place migration, right?
upvoted 0 times
Cherrie
3 months ago
That's right. It's not a valid option for DMO with SUM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
4 months ago
Yes, you're correct. Table count verification is not possible for an in-place migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77