Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_BTPA_2408 Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_BTPA_2408 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All P_BTPA_2408 Questions]

Company XYZ, a global firm with 25K+ employees across the geographic locations Europe (headquarters), the USA (manufacturing), and South America (procurement), is migrating to SAP S/4HANA using SAP BTP. Each geographic location has dedicated IT staff managing access, authorizations, and SAP BTP resource quotas. For cost control, the company aims to analyze and optimize the usage and cost of SAP BTP resources both globally and by geographic location, intending to enhance their SAP BTP Account model structure.

Which of the following SAP BTP account models are appropriate? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shawnta
2 months ago
I'd say B and D are the correct answers. Having a directory for each region within a global account seems like a logical way to organize the infrastructure, while still maintaining subaccounts for better cost control.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
1 months ago
Let's go with B and D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
2 months ago
It would definitely help with cost control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
2 months ago
Agreed, having a directory for each region makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
I think B and D are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
3 months ago
What, no option for 'All of the above'? I'm feeling a bit nostalgic for the good old days of multiple-choice exams. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
2 months ago
C) One global account with one directory for each region
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 months ago
B) One global account for each business function with a corresponding directory for that region
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
2 months ago
A) One global account for each business function with a corresponding subaccount for that region
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
3 months ago
I agree with Jerry, option D seems like the best choice for Company XYZ's situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
But having one global account with one subaccount for each region would allow for better cost control and resource management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
I agree with Darrel. Option D is the most appropriate as it aligns with the company's goal of analyzing and optimizing the usage and cost of SAP BTP resources globally and by geographic location.
upvoted 0 times
Heike
2 months ago
I agree with you, option D aligns well with the company's goal of enhancing their SAP BTP Account model structure for cost control and optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
2 months ago
What about option C? Having one global account with one directory for each region seems like a simple and effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
2 months ago
I see your point, but I believe option D is more suitable since it allows for better analysis and optimization of resources by region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
I think option A could work too, having a global account for each business function with a corresponding subaccount for that region.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerry
3 months ago
I think option A and D are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
3 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice. Having one global account with a subaccount for each region would allow for better visibility and control over the usage and costs of SAP BTP resources across the different locations.
upvoted 0 times
Howard
2 months ago
Yes, having a global account with subaccounts for each region would definitely help in managing costs and resources effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
3 months ago
I agree, option D does seem like the most efficient choice for Company XYZ.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77