Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_BTPA_2408 Topic 2 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_BTPA_2408 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 2
[All P_BTPA_2408 Questions]

You are a solution architect helping to design a custom-built application for business users. You must follow these use case parameters:

* The application requires data solely from SAP S/4HANA Cloud public edition.

* The application supports create, read, update, and delete (CRUD) operations.

* If multiple backend protocols are applicable the one with the fastest performance is to be used.

Which of the following combinations would you recommend for the application design?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Margot
5 days ago
I've got a feeling that if we choose anything other than Option A, the SAP gods might smite us. Let's play it safe and go with the OData-Fiori combo. After all, who wants to anger the SAP overlords?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
SOAP binding? What is this, the early 2000s? Let's keep it simple and go with Option A. OData is the way of the future, and Fiori is the UI that business users love.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
7 days ago
Let's go with Option A then. It meets all the use case parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
16 days ago
I agree, Fiori is user-friendly and OData is a modern protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alise
18 days ago
Option A sounds like the best choice. OData is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
1 months ago
Oof, IDoc binding? Really? I think we should steer clear of that, it's a bit too legacy for this modern application. Option A is the way to go, my dude.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 months ago
Wait, wait, hold up. Are we sure we want to use RFC binding on SAP S/4HANA Cloud? Isn't that a bit outdated? I'd go with Option A to stay future-proof.
upvoted 0 times
Lezlie
6 days ago
Let's go with the fastest performance option for the backend, which is OData service binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
16 days ago
Option A seems to align well with the use case parameters provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
19 days ago
I agree, RFC binding might not be the best option for future scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
27 days ago
SAP Fiori frontend with OData service binding on SAP S/4HANA Cloud sounds like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Using SAP Build Apps for the frontend might not be the most efficient choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
1 months ago
Hmm, SAP Fiori seems like the way to go for the frontend. OData is the fastest protocol, so Option A looks like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
20 days ago
I agree, Option A is the most efficient choice. SAP Fiori and OData are a great combination for this application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
21 days ago
Option A looks like the best choice. SAP Fiori for the frontend and OData service binding on SAP S/4HANA Cloud for the backend.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
I agree with Shawna. Option A seems to align perfectly with the use case parameters provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because using SAP Fiori for the frontend and OData service binding for the backend would ensure fast performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77