A and D, all the way! Selecting activity prices from other versions and the combined run, that's the real deal. Though I'm not sure about the 'reduced number of steps' - maybe they just made the cockpit more confusing.
I'm going with A and D. Selecting activity prices from other CO-versions and the combined run for standard and alternative valuations just make sense for actual costing.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? That's like saying I can get my taxes done faster by setting the house on fire. I'll go with B and D.
B and D seem like the correct answers. The simplified data structure and combined run for both standard and alternative valuations are definitely features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Cheryl
6 months agoVenita
6 months agoVeronika
6 months agoMira
6 months agoGeraldo
7 months agoKiera
5 months agoStevie
6 months agoEdelmira
6 months agoEdelmira
6 months agoRodolfo
6 months agoRodolfo
6 months agoAdelaide
7 months agoTracie
6 months agoCharlie
6 months agoAntonio
7 months agoElfrieda
7 months agoBrande
7 months agoJanna
6 months agoMarge
6 months agoReed
6 months agoMaurine
6 months agoMalcolm
6 months agoGerri
6 months agoJanessa
6 months agoAlyce
7 months agoArlene
7 months agoCasey
7 months agoFreida
7 months agoElfrieda
7 months ago