I'm feeling confident with B and D. Streamlining the data structure and combining the runs? Sounds like SAP is finally catching up to the 21st century. Although, I heard the developers celebrated with a LAN party after nailing down these new features. Explains the 'simplified' part, I suppose.
I'm not sure about the reduced number of steps, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA includes selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
A and D look good to me. Anything that helps me avoid the standard run is a plus. I mean, who needs 'activity prices of other CO-versions' anyway? Sounds like a whole lot of unnecessary complexity.
I'm going with B and D. Reducing table structures and combining runs sounds like a recipe for efficiency. Although, I heard the SAP team had a bake-off to decide on the new features. Probably explains the 'simplified' part.
Simona
2 months agoSherita
1 months agoCarli
2 months agoGayla
2 months agoAlishia
2 months agoEden
3 months agoGolda
3 months agoSherell
3 months agoMose
3 months agoCorinne
2 months agoJaleesa
2 months agoKatina
2 months agoTresa
3 months agoFernanda
3 months agoOna
3 months agoDean
2 months agoBeatriz
3 months agoShenika
3 months agoWalker
3 months agoJamal
3 months agoJamal
3 months agoLili
4 months ago