I'm feeling confident with B and D. Streamlining the data structure and combining the runs? Sounds like SAP is finally catching up to the 21st century. Although, I heard the developers celebrated with a LAN party after nailing down these new features. Explains the 'simplified' part, I suppose.
I'm not sure about the reduced number of steps, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA includes selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
A and D look good to me. Anything that helps me avoid the standard run is a plus. I mean, who needs 'activity prices of other CO-versions' anyway? Sounds like a whole lot of unnecessary complexity.
I'm going with B and D. Reducing table structures and combining runs sounds like a recipe for efficiency. Although, I heard the SAP team had a bake-off to decide on the new features. Probably explains the 'simplified' part.
Simona
6 months agoSherita
5 months agoCarli
5 months agoGayla
5 months agoAlishia
5 months agoEden
6 months agoGolda
6 months agoSherell
6 months agoMose
6 months agoCorinne
5 months agoJaleesa
6 months agoKatina
6 months agoTresa
6 months agoFernanda
6 months agoOna
7 months agoDean
6 months agoBeatriz
6 months agoShenika
6 months agoWalker
7 months agoJamal
6 months agoJamal
6 months agoLili
7 months ago