Ooh, selecting activity prices from other CO-versions? Sounds like a trick question to me. I'm sticking with B and D as the right answers. Less complexity is always a win in my book.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? If only it were that easy! I'll go with B and D as the correct answers. Gotta love those SAP upgrades that make our lives easier.
I'm not sure about the other options, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA does not involve selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
I agree with Glory. Option B and D seem to be the most relevant features here. Wish I had that simplified data structure when I was doing my costing in the old system!
I think the correct answers are B and D. The simplified data structure and combined run for standard and alternative valuations are definitely key features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Jerrod
4 months agoGeoffrey
3 months agoGeoffrey
4 months agoGeoffrey
4 months agoDorcas
4 months agoCoral
4 months agoMerissa
3 months agoGlenn
3 months agoMerilyn
3 months agoJoanna
4 months agoCandra
5 months agoLetha
5 months agoJuliann
5 months agoDahlia
4 months agoDahlia
5 months agoLizette
5 months agoRosendo
4 months agoGarry
4 months agoLina
4 months agoGladys
4 months agoLouisa
5 months agoLawana
5 months agoAide
6 months agoCecil
6 months agoBernadine
6 months agoGlory
6 months agoLon
5 months agoMattie
5 months ago