Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

As an Enterprise Architect, you must ensure that future extensions to the Digital Core of the enterprise guarantee stable and reliable operations. The architecture guideline demands to follow the clean-core strategy. What does this demand ensure and entail?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hyun
4 months ago
Side-by-side extensibility all the way! No need to mess with the core when you can build on top of it cleanly. Option C gets my vote.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
4 months ago
I see the benefits of option B, direct access to SAP tables can be efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
4 months ago
Ha! Direct table access? That's a recipe for disaster. Option C is the way to go - keep those extensions separate and follow the SAP guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
I prefer option C, keeping extensions separate seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
4 months ago
Option A sounds like the winner to me. Keeping those interfaces well-defined and upgrade-stable is crucial for future-proofing the system.
upvoted 1 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
I agree, option A ensures stability during upgrades.
upvoted 1 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
The clean-core strategy is the way to go. Extensions that don't break upgrades and vice versa - that's what I'm looking for in a robust architecture!
upvoted 0 times
Celestine
3 months ago
C) Extensions are kept strictly separate from the SAP application, Extensions are developed in accordance with the SAP Application Extension Methodology. Side-by-side extensibility options are always preferable to on-stack extensibility options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
4 months ago
A) Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suresh
4 months ago
Hi Experts, Answer should be option A right? Extensions do not break an upgrade, and upgrades do not break an extension. Such extensions can access SAP business objects only through well defined, upgrade-stable interfaces. But practice shows B as correct answer please advise. Thanks,
upvoted 1 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77