Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 3 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 3
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

Which of the following are the best architectural decisions for an extension application in S/4HANA?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The decision for the extension model in S/4HANA should be based on the nature of the extension required. Developer Extensibility (in-app extensibility) is suitable for data-intensive extensions that need to operate within the context of S/4HANA. This is because it allows for direct access to S/4HANA's digital core and leverages the power of the HANA database. It is the recommended approach when the extension requires tight integration with core data and processes, ensuring high performance and data consistency.

On the other hand, Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP ABAP Environment is recommended when the extensions need to utilize additional SAP BTP services such as advanced analytics, machine learning, IoT services, or when creating new user experiences with SAPUI5. This decouples the extensions from the S/4HANA core, which can be beneficial in terms of flexibility, agility, and reducing the impact on the core system during upgrades.

Reference = These practices are supported by SAP's extensibility guide for S/4HANA, which explains the two extensibility models and their appropriate use cases. SAP documentation on ABAP Platform extensibility options provides further insights into when to choose each extensibility approach. SAP Best Practices for Extensibility in SAP S/4HANA guide provides a comprehensive view on how to extend the digital core effectively while maintaining system integrity and upgradeability.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dierdre
27 days ago
Option A gets my vote. Why reinvent the wheel when you can use SAP's own extensibility tools? Less headaches, more productivity.
upvoted 0 times
Tequila
8 days ago
I agree, using SAP's tools seems like the most efficient way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
13 days ago
Option A gets my vote. Why reinvent the wheel when you can use SAP's own extensibility tools? Less headaches, more productivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jaclyn
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old debate of 'build it in-house' vs 'leverage the cloud'. Option A looks like a great balance between the two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
1 months ago
I like how Option C clearly differentiates the use cases for each approach. Keeping the UI separate from core ABAP logic is a sound architectural decision.
upvoted 0 times
Tony
15 days ago
Absolutely, it allows for better separation of concerns and makes the code more scalable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
15 days ago
Using 'Developer Extensibility' for ABAP extensions that do not require a UI component is a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
18 days ago
I agree, separating the UI from the core logic makes the application more modular and easier to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
19 days ago
Absolutely, having that clear distinction between the UI and the backend logic can really streamline development and improve overall performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
20 days ago
I agree, it's important to have a clear separation of concerns in your architecture. It makes troubleshooting and updates much smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
26 days ago
Option C is definitely the way to go for extensions that require a UI component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
26 days ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Separating the UI from the core logic makes everything cleaner and easier to maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alica
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it specifies the use of Developer Extensibility for ABAP extensions that do not require a UI component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it covers both data-intensive ABAP extensions and SAPUI5 user interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
2 months ago
Option B seems the most comprehensive and flexible choice. Separating data-intensive extensions from UI-driven ones is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
8 days ago
User 4: I agree, it's a smart move to have that separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
15 days ago
User 3: Option B seems like the most comprehensive and flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, separating data-intensive extensions from UI-driven ones makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
29 days ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77