Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 7 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 7
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

Which of the following are the best architectural decisions for an extension application in S/4HANA?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jeanice
5 months ago
I see both perspectives, but I lean towards option C. Developer Extensibility for ABAP extensions that don't need a UI component and Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP for SAPUI5 user interfaces makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
5 months ago
I disagree. Option B seems more reasonable to me. It allows for Developer Extensibility for data-intensive extensions and Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP for less data-intensive applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it offers Developer Extensibility for data-intensive ABAP extensions and Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP ABAP Environment for additional services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, as it suggests using Developer Extensibility for non-UI components and Side-by-Side Extensibility for UI requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
5 months ago
Wait, what's the difference between 'data-intensive' and 'less data-intensive'? Are we talking bytes or just a few records? Anyway, I'm leaning towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better because it provides flexibility for less data-intensive applications and intensively used SAP BTP services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
Haha, I'm just happy I don't have to build a SAPUI5 interface. That sounds like a headache! I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
4 months ago
I'm glad we all agree on option C. It's the most practical decision for our extension application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
5 months ago
Great choice! Option C is definitely the way to go if you want to avoid dealing with SAPUI5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
5 months ago
Yeah, I'll go with option C as well. It's a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
5 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice then, since it doesn't require a UI component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
5 months ago
I agree, building a SAPUI5 interface can be challenging.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Boris
6 months ago
Hmm, option C looks interesting. If I don't need a UI, then Developer Extensibility could be the simpler choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
6 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. It seems to strike the right balance between data-intensive and less data-intensive extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for data-intensive ABAP extensions and SAPUI5 user interfaces when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77