Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAS Exam A00-260 Topic 2 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-260 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 2
[All A00-260 Questions]

Within SAS Data Integration Studio, automatic mappings are disabled for a job. A transformation has defined source columns and defined target columns. One of the source columns, named COLI, is character with a length of 50. One of the target columns, named COLI, is also character but of length 25. What will happen if the COLI columns are mapped?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sage
5 months ago
Aw, man, you know SAS is gonna be all up in your business about that length mismatch. Option D all the way, no doubt about it. It's like your grandma telling you to wear a sweater - you can ignore her, but she's still gonna give you that look.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
5 months ago
D is the winner here. SAS is all about that data integrity, so it's not gonna let you just slide on a length mismatch. But hey, at least it's still gonna let you map the columns, even if it's gonna throw a warning your way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Gotta go with D, my dude. SAS ain't gonna be happy about that length difference, but it'll still let you map the columns. Probably gonna give you a warning, though, just to keep you on your toes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
Option D is the way to go. I mean, come on, you can't just pretend the length mismatch doesn't exist. SAS is gonna let you know about it, even if it still lets you map the columns.
upvoted 0 times
Hayley
4 months ago
Yeah, SAS will give a warning about the length mismatch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
Option D is definitely the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
5 months ago
Yeah, it's better to be aware of any potential issues upfront.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
5 months ago
Option D is definitely the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carole
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, with no warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
6 months ago
The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, but a warning occurs. That's a no-brainer! SAS ain't gonna let you just ignore length differences like that.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
6 months ago
Yeah, SAS won't let you ignore length differences like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
6 months ago
I think the COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, but a warning occurs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
6 months ago
D) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, but a warning occurs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
6 months ago
A) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, with no warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mollie
7 months ago
I think the answer is B) The COLI columns are not mapped because the lengths are different.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77