Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-DevOps Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ora
6 months ago
That's a good point too. It's all about finding the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
6 months ago
I think releasing it to production is also a valid purpose, to start capturing value from customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
7 months ago
Yes, that's true. It's important to gather feedback early on to make improvements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
7 months ago
But isn't the purpose also to demo to Product Management for feedback?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
7 months ago
I agree with we need to test our assumptions before investing more resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
7 months ago
The purpose of a minimum viable product is to validate the hypothesis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
8 months ago
I'm with you all on this. Option C is the clear winner, but I'm curious to hear what everyone thinks about the other options. Are there any cases where you might want to demo to Product Management or sell to new markets with an MVP?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
8 months ago
Absolutely. The whole point of an MVP is to get in front of real customers and see if your assumptions hold up. That's the only way to build something that people actually want.
upvoted 0 times
Amos
7 months ago
To demo to Product Management for feedback
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
7 months ago
Absolutely. The whole point of an MVP is to get in front of real customers and see if your assumptions hold up. That's the only way to build something that people actually want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
7 months ago
To validate the hypothesis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, option B is definitely the 'move fast and break things' approach. I'd much rather take the time to validate my ideas before unleashing them on the world.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
8 months ago
You know, I'm surprised option B is even an option. Who in their right mind would just release an MVP to production without validating it first? That's a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
...
France
8 months ago
Agreed, option C is the clear winner here. An MVP is all about learning and testing your assumptions, not just showing off or making money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
8 months ago
I think this is a great question that really gets at the core of agile development. The purpose of an MVP is definitely to validate the hypothesis and get customer feedback, not to just demo to management or release to production.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77