Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-RTE Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-RTE exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All SAFe-RTE Questions]

During Program Increment (PI) Planning, a scrum of scrums occurs just before the draft plan review. The Scrum Master from one team raises an issue that one of the Product Managers just showed up to the planning area with a priority wish list of items. These items do not align with the Feature prioritization. What is the most likely planning anti-pattern causing this sudden impediment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Deangelo
4 months ago
Ah, the joys of 'autonomous prioritization'. It's like trying to herd cats with a laser pointer. C is the clear winner, unless the Product Manager has a magic wand hidden up their sleeve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
4 months ago
I can picture the Product Manager showing up with their 'priority wish list' like a kid in a candy store. Spoiler alert: it's not going to end well. C is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
3 months ago
B) Planning decisions have been centralized
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
3 months ago
C) Prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryl
4 months ago
Well, well, well... looks like someone forgot to send the Product Manager the Scrum Manifesto. I bet they're still using carrier pigeons for communication. C is the answer, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
4 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle between the 'Visionary' and the 'Collaborative'. Looks like someone forgot the cardinal rule of Scrum - 'All for one, and one for all'. C is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Bette
3 months ago
A) There is strong alignment between business and marketing
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
3 months ago
B) Planning decisions have been centralized
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
3 months ago
C) Prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
4 months ago
A) There is strong alignment between business and marketing
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
4 months ago
B) Planning decisions have been centralized
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
4 months ago
C) Prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
5 months ago
I see your point, Irma. Centralized planning decisions could definitely lead to misalignment during PI Planning. It's important for all teams to collaborate and align on priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 months ago
This sounds like a classic case of the 'Lone Ranger' Product Manager syndrome. Centralized planning decisions and autonomous prioritization are a recipe for disaster. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
4 months ago
B) Planning decisions have been centralized
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
C) Prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
5 months ago
But could it also be B) Planning decisions have been centralized? Maybe that's why the Product Manager showed up with a separate wish list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
5 months ago
I agree with Laurene. When Product Management prioritizes items without collaboration, it can cause issues during PI Planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
5 months ago
I think the most likely planning anti-pattern is C) Prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77