Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SGP Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What is the appropriate Lean action to take once all of the expected value of an Epic has been delivered, even if all of the planned Features have not been completed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The appropriate Lean action to take once all of the expected value of an Epic has been delivered, even if all of the planned Features have not been completed, is to close the Epic1. This means that the Epic Owner declares that the epic is done and no further work is required. Closing the epic frees up the resources and budget that were allocated to it, and allows the teams to focus on other value streams and initiatives.Closing the epic also enables the Epic Owner to measure the actual outcomes and benefits of the epic, and compare them with the expected ones in the Lean business case2. Closing the epic does not mean that the solution is fixed and cannot be changed or improved later.It simply means that the current hypothesis of the epic has been validated or invalidated, and that further work can be initiated as new epics or features if needed3.

1:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework2:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework3:Epic - Scaled Agile Framework


Contribute your Thoughts:

Genevieve
7 months ago
I would suggest continuing to build Features until the contract can be modified to ensure full delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
7 months ago
I agree with User2, it's important to deliver what was promised in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
7 months ago
But wouldn't it make sense to finish all of the Features since they were included in the contract?
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
7 months ago
I think the appropriate Lean action would be to close the Epic.
upvoted 0 times
Tony
7 months ago
Initiating an early re-compete could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
7 months ago
I think continuing to build Features until the contract can be modified would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
7 months ago
But what about finishing all of the Features as per the contract?
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
7 months ago
I agree, closing the Epic makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
8 months ago
Alright, alright, let's get serious here. I think option A is the way to go. If the value's been delivered, we should just wrap it up and move on. No need to overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
8 months ago
I agree, closing the Epic seems like the right move if the value has been delivered. But what if there are important features that still need to be built? I'm not sure option A is the best choice in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
8 months ago
This question is a bit tricky. I'm not sure if the expected value of the Epic has been delivered, but if that's the case, I think option A) Close the Epic makes the most sense. We shouldn't just keep building features for the sake of it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77