Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SGP Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 6
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

Which statement is true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to theVisualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengthsarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The article states that ''To improve the economics of handling smaller batches---and thus increase throughput---teams must focus on reducing the transaction costs of any batch. This is a continuous improvement activity that happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the statements that are true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program. Batch size is not optimized immediately by looking at transaction and holding costs (B), as it takes time for teams to understand the nature of the work, identify bottlenecks, and find the optimal batch size that minimizes both costs. Batch size is not already optimized if there is continuous flow , as optimization involves finding the right balance between batch size and costs, even within a continuous flow environment. Batch size is not optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change (D), as holding costs and transaction costs can change over time due to various factors such as team size, workload, and external dependencies.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Belen
2 months ago
This question is like asking how to get the perfect haircut - there's no one-size-fits-all answer!
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
1 months ago
D) Batch size is optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 months ago
I think it depends on the specific team and their processes
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
2 months ago
C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
2 months ago
A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
But batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A. Optimizing batch size is like finding the perfect temperature for your coffee - it takes some trial and error.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
2 months ago
C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's all about finding that sweet spot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
2 months ago
A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
D is the way to go. Once those costs stabilize, you can just set it and forget it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
3 months ago
C seems like the obvious answer. If there's continuous flow, then the batch size must already be optimized, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
3 months ago
B sounds good to me. Surely the experts would have already calculated the optimal batch size based on the costs.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
2 months ago
D might be the answer. If costs rarely change, batch size could be optimized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
C seems like a good option. Continuous flow indicates optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
2 months ago
B sounds good to me. The costs must have been considered by the experts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
3 months ago
I think A is more accurate. Batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Batch size optimization is an ongoing process as teams gain experience and find the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
Carol
2 months ago
Yes, it's important for teams to consider both holding and transaction costs when optimizing batch sizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
3 months ago
I agree, batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgeanna
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77