Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SGP Topic 7 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 7
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What type of decision may significantly affect lead time for systems development?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, using firm fixed price contracts may significantly affect lead time for systems development. The article states that ''Firm fixed price (FFP) contracts are often used in government programs, but they are not well suited for Agile development. FFP contracts typically require detailed specifications and fixed scope, which are incompatible with the iterative and adaptive nature of Agile. FFP contracts also create a misalignment of incentives between the contractor and the government, as they reward the contractor for delivering the minimum acceptable solution, rather than the best possible value. FFP contracts also discourage collaboration and feedback, as any change in scope or requirements may trigger lengthy negotiations and contract modifications.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, using firm fixed price contracts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the types of decisions that may significantly affect lead time for systems development. Using relative size estimating (B) is a common Agile practice that helps teams plan and track their work. Approved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members are enablers, not impediments, of systems development. Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF (D) is a method of applying an economic view to optimize value delivery.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Magnolia
3 months ago
I believe prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF can definitely impact lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
3 months ago
I agree with Erasmo, having an approved budget and dedicated team members is crucial for lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
3 months ago
I believe C is the best option because having the right resources and tools in place is essential for efficient systems development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
3 months ago
But what about using WSJF to prioritize the product backlog? That could also affect lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
4 months ago
I agree with Yoko, having an approved budget and dedicated team members is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
4 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
4 months ago
D, of course! Anything that involves the word 'backlog' is bound to be a surefire win. I mean, who doesn't love a good ol' fashioned product backlog shuffle?
upvoted 0 times
Royce
3 months ago
Absolutely, having a clear priority list can definitely impact lead time for systems development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
3 months ago
I agree, prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF can really help streamline the development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearly
4 months ago
Clearly A is the answer. Fixed price contracts? That's like signing a blank check and hoping for the best. C'mon, folks, let's get real here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
4 months ago
B is the way to go. Relative size estimating is the secret sauce for cutting lead time - no more guessing games!
upvoted 0 times
Charlene
3 months ago
Absolutely, it's all about making informed decisions to optimize the development timeline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
3 months ago
It's true, having a clear understanding of the relative size of tasks can make a big difference in lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
4 months ago
I agree, using relative size estimating can really help streamline the development process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
4 months ago
Hmm, I'd say D. Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF sounds like a more agile approach to managing development. Who needs fixed prices and all that bureaucracy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
4 months ago
Definitely C - approved budget, required tools, and dedicated team members are key to reducing lead time. Anything less is just a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Gaston
3 months ago
Firm fixed price contracts may not always be the best option for reducing lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
3 months ago
Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF is another important factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alethea
3 months ago
Using relative size estimating can also help in making decisions that affect lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
3 months ago
I agree, having an approved budget and dedicated team members is crucial for reducing lead time.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77