Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

ScrumStudy Exam SMC Topic 4 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for ScrumStudy's SMC exam

Question #: 99
Topic #: 4

[All SMC Questions]

You are the Scrum Master for a new project. This project will have 80 developers contributing to the product. As a Scrum Master, how would you divide a group of 80 people into multiple Development Teams?

ACreate ten teams of eight people per team.

BCreate eight teams of 10 people per team.

CCoach the Development Team about being self-organizing, but also coach the team to form based on relationships from past projects.

DTell the 80 developers about the product, the product vision, and rules of the Scrum framework, then allow the 80 developers to self-organize into separate teams.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Mitsue at Sep 13, 2024, 04:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SMC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Otis

2 months ago

If I had 80 developers, I'd probably just tell them to 'go forth and multiply' into teams. Let the chaos ensue!

upvoted 0 times

Linwood

29 days ago

D) Tell the 80 developers about the product, the product vision, and rules of the Scrum framework, then allow the 80 developers to self-organize into separate teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

1 months ago

C) Coach the Development Team about being self-organizing, but also coach the team to form based on relationships from past projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

1 months ago

B) Create eight teams of 10 people per team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

1 months ago

A) Create ten teams of eight people per team.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Rolande

2 months ago

I like the idea of self-organization in D, but 80 people? That's a lot of herding cats!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

2 months ago

Ten teams of eight people per team sounds like a nice, even split. Clean and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

2 months ago

C seems like a good compromise. Leverage past relationships, but still let the team self-organize.

upvoted 0 times

Chaya

30 days ago

Yes, that way the teams can form based on their strengths and working styles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

1 months ago

I agree, it's important to leverage past relationships while still allowing the team to self-organize.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laine

1 months ago

C seems like a good compromise.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Rasheeda

2 months ago

I prefer option D. Giving the developers the freedom to self-organize can lead to more motivated and engaged teams.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

2 months ago

I agree with Stephane. Option C promotes collaboration and allows the team to leverage their existing dynamics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephane

3 months ago

I think option C is the best approach. It allows the team to self-organize based on their past relationships and experiences.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiera

3 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Let the developers self-organize, that's the Agile way!

upvoted 0 times

Almeta

2 months ago

I agree, it also allows the teams to form based on their strengths and past working relationships.

upvoted 0 times

...

Therese

2 months ago

Option D is the best approach. Letting the developers self-organize promotes autonomy and ownership.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77