Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-Discovery Topic 9 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-Discovery exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 9
[All CIS-Discovery Questions]

Which choice best describes what happens when, by default, duplicate CIs are detected during identification and reconciliation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arlene
3 months ago
I think the answer is A, because a notification should be sent to the CI owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C as well. It seems like the most comprehensive way to handle duplicate CIs without disrupting the overall process.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
1 months ago
True, but option C does seem like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should consider all the options before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
2 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to handle duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
3 months ago
Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one. Imagine the discovery process just grinding to a halt because of a few pesky duplicates!
upvoted 0 times
Barney
3 months ago
Yeah, that would be quite the unexpected outcome!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
3 months ago
Haha, option D is definitely the funniest one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryanne
3 months ago
But wouldn't it make sense to stop the next discovery for the duplicated CI?
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
3 months ago
Hmm, I think I'd go with option B. Automatically creating an associated identification rule sounds like a more proactive approach to dealing with duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to just send a notification to the CI owner so they can handle it themselves?
upvoted 0 times
Annice
3 months ago
But having duplicate CIs added to a de-duplication task could also be helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
3 months ago
I think sending a notification to the CI owner is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
4 months ago
Option C seems like the most logical choice. It makes sense to add the duplicate CIs to a de-duplication task for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D seems like it could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
3 months ago
I think option A could also be a possibility, sending a notification to the CI owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
3 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryanne
4 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77