Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-RCI Topic 4 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-RCI exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-RCI Questions]

How does GRC: Policy and Compliance Management track compliance to Authority Documents?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Clemencia
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D makes sense too, as citations are mapped to control objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
4 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Mapping everything to the control objectives is the key to ensuring proper compliance tracking.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
3 months ago
Absolutely, it provides a clear link between the requirements and the controls that need to be in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
3 months ago
I think it's a more efficient way to track compliance compared to other methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
4 months ago
It definitely simplifies the process and makes it easier to ensure everything is in line with regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
4 months ago
I agree, mapping Authority Documents to control objectives is crucial for compliance tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earnestine
4 months ago
I believe it's A, because citations are mapped to entity-scoped controls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
5 months ago
Ha! Good thing I read the Authority Documents closely. C is definitely the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
5 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think C is the correct answer. The others don't seem to provide the full picture.
upvoted 0 times
Lavelle
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but C does sound like a logical choice. Mapping to control objectives seems like a good way to track compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
3 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most comprehensive option. It ensures compliance is checked when controls are tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
3 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. It makes sense to map Authority Documents to control objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C is the best choice. Mapping Authority Documents to control objectives seems like a thorough approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most comprehensive option. It ensures compliance is checked when controls are tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
4 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. It makes sense to map Authority Documents to control objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most comprehensive option. It ensures compliance is checked when controls are tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
4 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. It makes sense to map Authority Documents to control objectives for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
I agree with Goldie, because compliance is checked when controls are tested.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
5 months ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Tying it all together with the control objectives is a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
4 months ago
It's a smart approach to track compliance effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
4 months ago
Definitely. It helps ensure that compliance is checked at the right level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
5 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Mapping Authority Documents to control objectives makes compliance tracking more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
5 months ago
I think C is the best option. It ties everything together nicely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
5 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
5 months ago
Option C seems the most comprehensive. Mapping Authority Documents to control objectives and checking compliance during control testing makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Tom
4 months ago
Yes, mapping Authority Documents to control objectives and checking compliance during control testing is a logical way to track compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
4 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77