Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SP Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SP exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-SP Questions]

Given TOP as a parent domain for MSP, ACME, and Initech, and MSP contains TOP What additional domain configuration is required for UserA in MSP to read records in ACME?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In ServiceNow, domain separation is used to manage data visibility and access control in a multi-tenant environment1. The 'contains' relationship in domain separation defines a hierarchy where a parent domain contains child domains, and by default, users in a parent domain can see the records in child domains1.

Given that TOP is the parent domain for MSP, ACME, and Initech, and MSP contains TOP, UserA in MSP would already have visibility into TOP. However, for UserA to read records in ACME, additional configuration is required because ACME is not a child domain of MSP by default.

The correct action is to add visibility to ACME for UserA . This is typically done by configuring the user's domain membership or by adjusting the domain visibility settings to include ACME for UserA. This ensures that UserA can access records in ACME while still being primarily associated with the MSP domain1.

The 'contains' relationship between MSP and ACME (A) is not necessary because it would imply a hierarchical relationship that does not reflect the given structure. Adding both visibility to ACME for UserA and contains between MSP and ACME (B) is also not required and could potentially create an incorrect domain hierarchy. No additional configurations (D) would not suffice as it would not grant UserA the access needed to read records in ACME.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Coletta
4 months ago
This question is making my head spin with all these domain names! Gotta love IT jargon. Anyway, I'm leaning towards B as well.
upvoted 0 times
Virgina
3 months ago
Definitely, those additional configurations should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
3 months ago
Agreed, and adding contains between MSP and ACME would help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
3 months ago
Yeah, adding visibility to ACME for UserA makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
I think B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Harley
4 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer was just trying to confuse us with all these domain relationships. But I think B is the answer they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Ellen
4 months ago
Yeah, adding visibility to ACME for UserA and contains between MSP and ACME should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
4 months ago
I agree, B seems like the right choice to give UserA access to ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
I'd go with D. No additional configurations are required if the parent-child relationship is already set up correctly between the domains.
upvoted 0 times
Karima
3 months ago
D it is then, thanks for the clarification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
Agreed, if the parent-child relationship is in place, UserA should be able to read records in ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
I think D is the right choice, no need for extra configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
4 months ago
I think D) No additional configurations is the correct answer, as UserA should already have access to read records in ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Add visibility to ACME for UserA could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Add both visibility to ACME for UserA, and contains between MSP and ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
Choice B seems like the right way to go. You need to grant visibility to ACME for UserA and also establish the 'contains' relationship between MSP and ACME.
upvoted 0 times
Dottie
3 months ago
Definitely. It's important to have both configurations in place for UserA to access the records in ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
3 months ago
That makes sense. Without both visibility and the contains relationship, UserA wouldn't be able to read records in ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
I agree, choice B is the best option. UserA needs visibility to ACME and a contains relationship between MSP and ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I think the answer is A) Add contains between MSP and ACME.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77