Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ServiceNow Exam CIS-SP Topic 4 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for ServiceNow's CIS-SP exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 4
[All CIS-SP Questions]

Why would you set Choice Action to Ignore on a transform field map?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Setting the Choice Action to ''Ignore'' on a transform field map in ServiceNow is used to avoid inserting dummy referenced records into the global domain. When importing data, if the system encounters a reference field value that does not match any existing records, setting the Choice Action to ''Ignore'' will prevent the creation of a new, potentially incorrect record. Instead, the system will skip the field and leave it blank, ensuring data integrity and avoiding the clutter of unnecessary records.

For more detailed information, you can refer to the following resources:

* ServiceNow Support Article on Transform Maps

* Choice Action Field in ServiceNow


Contribute your Thoughts:

Malcolm
3 months ago
I agree with Ira, A makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
But setting Choice Action to Ignore would avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global, which is what option A says.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
I agree with Lenna, A makes sense because we don't want unnecessary data in the global table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
But setting Choice Action to Ignore would avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
4 months ago
Haha, these certification questions can be tricky! I'm going to go with A - can't have those pesky dummy records messing up my data, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'd want to know more about the specific use case before deciding. Maybe C could work too?
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
4 months ago
I agree, maybe option C could also work depending on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
4 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to consider the specific use case before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
4 months ago
I think setting Choice Action to Ignore is to avoid inserting dummy referenced records into global.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
4 months ago
D seems like the right choice to me. Transforming field values with a script is a common use case for this setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Ignoring choice values seems like a good way to handle missing data.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
4 months ago
True, it really depends on the specific scenario and what you're trying to achieve with the transform field map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
I think option A is more about avoiding unnecessary records in the global.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
4 months ago
But what about option A? Could that also be a valid reason to set Choice Action to Ignore?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
4 months ago
I agree, option B is a good way to handle missing data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
4 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77