Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-C01 Topic 6 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-C01 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 6
[All ARA-C01 Questions]

A company has built a data pipeline using Snowpipe to ingest files from an Amazon S3 bucket. Snowpipe is configured to load data into staging database tables. Then a task runs to load the data from the staging database tables into the reporting database tables.

The company is satisfied with the availability of the data in the reporting database tables, but the reporting tables are not pruning effectively. Currently, a size 4X-Large virtual warehouse is being used to query all of the tables in the reporting database.

What step can be taken to improve the pruning of the reporting tables?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Effective pruning in Snowflake relies on the organization of data within micro-partitions. By using an ORDER BY clause with clustering keys when loading data into the reporting tables, Snowflake can better organize the data within micro-partitions. This organization allows Snowflake to skip over irrelevant micro-partitions during a query, thus improving query performance and reducing the amount of data scanned12.


* Snowflake Documentation on micro-partitions and data clustering2

* Community article on recognizing unsatisfactory pruning and improving it1

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glendora
6 months ago
True, Option A sounds inefficient. I agree, Option C seems practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
6 months ago
Eliminating Snowpipe (Option A) seems extreme and not related to pruning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
6 months ago
C makes sense. OPTIMIZE and ORDER BY can make data more accessible and improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Using ORDER BY might help with pruning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
7 months ago
Yeah, I think it's a bit challenging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
7 months ago
Interesting question, it's quite technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
8 months ago
It's one option. Another is to increase the size of the virtual warehouse to a size 5X-Large.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
Do you think that would help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
8 months ago
We can eliminate the use of Snowpipe and load the files into internal stages using PUT commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
8 months ago
What options do we have?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
8 months ago
We need to improve the pruning of the reporting tables.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77