Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-C01 Topic 6 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-C01 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 6
[All ARA-C01 Questions]

A company has a source system that provides JSON records for various loT operations. The JSON Is loading directly into a persistent table with a variant field. The data Is quickly growing to 100s of millions of records and performance to becoming an issue. There is a generic access pattern that Is used to filter on the create_date key within the variant field.

What can be done to improve performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A because it improves the performance of queries by reducing the amount of data scanned and processed. By adding a create_date field with a timestamp data type, Snowflake can automatically cluster the table based on this field and prune the micro-partitions that do not match the filter condition. This avoids the need to parse the JSON data and access the variant field for every record.

Option B is incorrect because it does not improve the performance of queries. By adding a create_date field with a varchar data type, Snowflake cannot automatically cluster the table based on this field and prune the micro-partitions that do not match the filter condition. This still requires parsing the JSON data and accessing the variant field for every record.

Option C is incorrect because it does not address the root cause of the performance issue. By validating the size of the warehouse being used, Snowflake can adjust the compute resources to match the data volume and parallelize the query execution. However, this does not reduce the amount of data scanned and processed, which is the main bottleneck for queries on JSON data.

Option D is incorrect because it adds unnecessary complexity and overhead to the data loading and querying process. By incorporating the use of multiple tables partitioned by date ranges, Snowflake can reduce the amount of data scanned and processed for queries that specify a date range. However, this requires creating and maintaining multiple tables, loading data into the appropriate table based on the date, and joining the tables for queries that span multiple date ranges.Reference:

Snowflake Documentation: Loading Data Using Snowpipe: This document explains how to use Snowpipe to continuously load data from external sources into Snowflake tables. It also describes the syntax and usage of the COPY INTO command, which supports various options and parameters to control the loading behavior, such as ON_ERROR, PURGE, and SKIP_FILE.

Snowflake Documentation: Date and Time Data Types and Functions: This document explains the different data types and functions for working with date and time values in Snowflake. It also describes how to set and change the session timezone and the system timezone.

Snowflake Documentation: Querying Metadata: This document explains how to query the metadata of the objects and operations in Snowflake using various functions, views, and tables. It also describes how to access the copy history information using the COPY_HISTORY function or the COPY_HISTORY view.

Snowflake Documentation: Loading JSON Data: This document explains how to load JSON data into Snowflake tables using various methods, such as the COPY INTO command, the INSERT command, or the PUT command. It also describes how to access and query JSON data using the dot notation, the FLATTEN function, or the LATERAL join.

Snowflake Documentation: Optimizing Storage for Performance: This document explains how to optimize the storage of data in Snowflake tables to improve the performance of queries. It also describes the concepts and benefits of automatic clustering, search optimization service, and materialized views.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rutha
3 days ago
I'm not sure about option C. Validating the warehouse size seems important, but I think partitioning the data like in option D would be more effective for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 days ago
Wait, so I can't just throw more storage at the problem? That's my go-to solution! Guess I need to actually think this through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
7 days ago
I agree with Tawna. Partitioning the data by date ranges can help optimize queries and improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
8 days ago
Wow, that's a lot of data to deal with! I'm glad they provided a few options to optimize the performance. Gotta make sure I understand the difference between timestamps and VARCHARs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
10 days ago
Sizing the warehouse properly is crucial to ensure good performance. I bet a lot of people miss that detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
12 days ago
I think option D could help improve performance by partitioning the data into multiple tables based on date ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
14 days ago
Partitioning by date ranges sounds like a good approach to handle all those millions of records. I wonder if we can automate the table selection based on the date range.
upvoted 0 times
Carry
4 days ago
A) Alter the target table to include additional fields pulled from the JSON records. This would include a create_date field with a datatype of time stamp. When this field is used in the filter, partition pruning will occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
20 days ago
Huh, I thought option B would work, but I guess partition pruning only works with timestamps. Gotta remember that for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Charlette
3 days ago
A: Alter the target table to include additional fields pulled from the JSON records. This would include a create_date field with a datatype of timestamp. When this field is used in the filter, partition pruning will occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77