Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is designing a process for importing a large amount of loT JSON data from cloud storage into Snowflake. New sets of loT data get generated and uploaded approximately every 5 minutes.

Once the loT data is in Snowflake, the company needs up-to-date information from an external vendor to join to the dat

a. This data is then presented to users through a dashboard that shows different levels of aggregation. The external vendor is a Snowflake customer.

What solution will MINIMIZE complexity and MAXIMIZE performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Using Snowpipe for continuous, automated data ingestion minimizes the need for manual intervention and ensures that data is available in Snowflake promptly after it is generated. Leveraging Snowflake's data sharing capabilities allows for efficient and secure access to the vendor's data without the need for complex API integrations. Materialized views provide pre-aggregated data for fast access, which is ideal for dashboards that require high performance1234.

Reference =

* Snowflake Documentation on Snowpipe4

* Snowflake Documentation on Secure Data Sharing2

* Best Practices for Data Ingestion with Snowflake1


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kassandra
6 months ago
As a Snowflake expert, I can tell you that Option B is the way to go. Data shares are the best way to bring in external data, and the transformation procedures will keep everything running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
6 months ago
Option C with the external function call to the vendor's API sounds interesting, but I'm not sure how reliable that would be. I think I'd prefer the more robust data share approach in Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Chun
5 months ago
I prefer the simplicity of Option B with the data share.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
5 months ago
I think Option C could work well if the vendor's API is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
5 months ago
I agree, Option B with the data share seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
5 months ago
I prefer the simplicity of Option B as well, the data share approach seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
5 months ago
I think Option C could work well if the vendor's API is reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
6 months ago
I agree, Option B with the data share seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gussie
6 months ago
Option D looks good, but I'm a bit worried about the materialized views. Aren't those a bit overkill for this scenario? I'd probably go with Option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
6 months ago
I agree with Theola, option A seems to minimize complexity and maximize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
6 months ago
Haha, I'm just glad they're not asking us to write code. I'd probably end up with a syntax error and be stuck on the question for an hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
6 months ago
Option B looks the most comprehensive and streamlined approach. Creating a data share with the vendor and using transformation procedures to join the data seems like the most efficient way to handle this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
6 months ago
Yes, I think so too. It's important to have a streamlined process when dealing with large amounts of data like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
6 months ago
Using transformation procedures to join the data back to the loT data is a smart move. It keeps everything organized and up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
6 months ago
Yes, I think creating a data share with the vendor will definitely simplify the process and improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
6 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice here. It covers all the necessary steps in a clear and efficient manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
6 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the best choice. It covers all the necessary steps in a clear and efficient manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theola
6 months ago
I think option A sounds good, it seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77