Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is following the Data Mesh principles, including domain separation, and chose one Snowflake account for its data platform.

An Architect created two data domains to produce two data products. The Architect needs a third data domain that will use both of the data products to create an aggregate data product. The read access to the data products will be granted through a separate role.

Based on the Data Mesh principles, how should the third domain be configured to create the aggregate product if it has been granted the two read roles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In the scenario described, where a third data domain needs access to two existing data products in a Snowflake account structured according to Data Mesh principles, the best approach is to utilize Snowflake's Data Exchange functionality. Option D is correct as it facilitates the sharing and governance of data across different domains efficiently and securely. Data Exchange allows domains to publish and subscribe to live data products, enabling real-time data collaboration and access management in a governed manner. This approach is in line with Data Mesh principles, which advocate for decentralized data ownership and architecture, enhancing agility and scalability across the organization. Reference:

Snowflake Documentation on Data Exchange

Articles on Data Mesh Principles in Data Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ricarda
4 months ago
Sysadmin role for a simple aggregation? Someone's been watching too many hacking movies!
upvoted 0 times
Sharen
3 months ago
D) Request that the two data domains share data using the Data Exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
Sysadmin role for a simple aggregation? Someone's been watching too many hacking movies!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
3 months ago
B) Create a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
3 months ago
A) Use secondary roles for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
5 months ago
I think requesting that the two data domains share data using the Data Exchange would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
5 months ago
C) Requesting a sysadmin user? That's overkill! B) is the way to go, keep it simple and secure.
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
4 months ago
A) Using secondary roles for all users could also work to maintain security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
4 months ago
C) Agreed, requesting a sysadmin user seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
4 months ago
B) Create a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
4 months ago
C) Requesting a sysadmin user? That's overkill! B) is the way to go, keep it simple and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
4 months ago
B) Create a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
4 months ago
A) Use secondary roles for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should use secondary roles for all users to maintain separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
5 months ago
I'm torn between B) and D), but I think B) is the simpler and more elegant solution. Data Mesh is all about autonomy, and hierarchy seems to fit that better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
5 months ago
D) Sharing data using the Data Exchange makes sense, but it might add an extra layer of complexity. I'd go with B) for a cleaner solution.
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
4 months ago
Yeah, it would keep things organized and easier to manage in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
5 months ago
I agree, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles seems like a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eladia
5 months ago
B) Create a hierarchy between the two read roles seems like the right approach. That way, the third domain can access the required data without needing a separate technical user.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
4 months ago
Requesting a technical ETL user with the sysadmin role seems unnecessary in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
4 months ago
Using secondary roles for all users might overcomplicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
4 months ago
It would simplify access to the data products for the third domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
5 months ago
I agree, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Effie
5 months ago
I agree with Paulina, it makes sense to have a hierarchy for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
I think we should create a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77