Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is following the Data Mesh principles, including domain separation, and chose one Snowflake account for its data platform.

An Architect created two data domains to produce two data products. The Architect needs a third data domain that will use both of the data products to create an aggregate data product. The read access to the data products will be granted through a separate role.

Based on the Data Mesh principles, how should the third domain be configured to create the aggregate product if it has been granted the two read roles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In the scenario described, where a third data domain needs access to two existing data products in a Snowflake account structured according to Data Mesh principles, the best approach is to utilize Snowflake's Data Exchange functionality. Option D is correct as it facilitates the sharing and governance of data across different domains efficiently and securely. Data Exchange allows domains to publish and subscribe to live data products, enabling real-time data collaboration and access management in a governed manner. This approach is in line with Data Mesh principles, which advocate for decentralized data ownership and architecture, enhancing agility and scalability across the organization. Reference:

Snowflake Documentation on Data Exchange

Articles on Data Mesh Principles in Data Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mitsue
6 months ago
Haha, imagine if the architect tried to use secondary roles for all users! That would be a nightmare to manage. I'd go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
6 months ago
C is definitely the wrong choice. I can't imagine the company would want to give a technical ETL user the sysadmin role just for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
6 months ago
I don't know, I'm leaning towards D. Sharing data using the Data Exchange seems like it would be the most scalable solution in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
5 months ago
Yeah, it makes sense to leverage the Data Exchange for sharing data between the domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to create the aggregate product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
I think D is a good option. Sharing data using the Data Exchange can help with scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kandis
6 months ago
Hmm, I think B is the way to go. Creating a hierarchy between the two read roles seems like the most efficient and secure approach.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
5 months ago
It definitely helps in maintaining control and access to the data products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
6 months ago
I agree, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
6 months ago
Definitely, it helps maintain control and access to the data products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
6 months ago
I agree, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
6 months ago
Yes, it would ensure that the third domain can access the data products securely and efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
6 months ago
I agree, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles makes sense for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77