Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 4 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 4
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is designing a process for importing a large amount of loT JSON data from cloud storage into Snowflake. New sets of loT data get generated and uploaded approximately every 5 minutes.

Once the loT data is in Snowflake, the company needs up-to-date information from an external vendor to join to the dat

a. This data is then presented to users through a dashboard that shows different levels of aggregation. The external vendor is a Snowflake customer.

What solution will MINIMIZE complexity and MAXIMIZE performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Using Snowpipe for continuous, automated data ingestion minimizes the need for manual intervention and ensures that data is available in Snowflake promptly after it is generated. Leveraging Snowflake's data sharing capabilities allows for efficient and secure access to the vendor's data without the need for complex API integrations. Materialized views provide pre-aggregated data for fast access, which is ideal for dashboards that require high performance1234.

Reference =

* Snowflake Documentation on Snowpipe4

* Snowflake Documentation on Secure Data Sharing2

* Best Practices for Data Ingestion with Snowflake1


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mitzie
6 months ago
Good point, D may maximize performance with those same elements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
6 months ago
True, but D also uses data shares and materialized views, minimizes complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
6 months ago
B looks appealing with data shares and views for the dashboard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
7 months ago
I think C's use of Snowpipe and materialized views is smart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
7 months ago
Yeah, but option D seems clear and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
7 months ago
This question is tough, feels complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
8 months ago
That's true, but I think having the vendor create a data share in option B simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
8 months ago
But what about option C? Using Snowpipe to bring in the data and materialized views for aggregations also sounds good.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
8 months ago
I agree. Creating an external table and using a transformation procedure every 5 minutes seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
8 months ago
I think the best solution is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77