Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 4 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 4
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A Developer is having a performance issue with a Snowflake query. The query receives up to 10 different values for one parameter and then performs an aggregation over the majority of a fact table. It then

joins against a smaller dimension table. This parameter value is selected by the different query users when they execute it during business hours. Both the fact and dimension tables are loaded with new data in an overnight import process.

On a Small or Medium-sized virtual warehouse, the query performs slowly. Performance is acceptable on a size Large or bigger warehouse. However, there is no budget to increase costs. The Developer

needs a recommendation that does not increase compute costs to run this query.

What should the Architect recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Enabling the search optimization service on the table can improve the performance of queries that have selective filtering criteria, which seems to be the case here. This service optimizes the execution of queries by creating a persistent data structure called a search access path, which allows some micro-partitions to be skipped during the scanning process. This can significantly speed up query performance without increasing compute costs1.

Reference

* Snowflake Documentation on Search Optimization Service1.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Anissa
4 months ago
I can't believe they're even considering option A. Caching query results? What is this, the Stone Age? I'd rather just set up a dedicated warehouse and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
Option C seems like a bit of a wild card. I'm not convinced the search optimization service can really work its magic on this query. It's worth a shot, I guess, but I wouldn't put all my money on it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scot
4 months ago
This query sounds like a real headache. I'd go with option D and create a dedicated size Large warehouse. After all, who needs to save money when you can just throw more hardware at the problem?
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
3 months ago
I agree, sometimes you just need to scale up to get the performance you need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
4 months ago
Option D seems like the best solution. Just throw more hardware at it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brett
4 months ago
Option A looks good, but I'm not sure if caching the query results will be enough to handle the performance issues. It might be better to schedule the task to run right before the users start their workday.
upvoted 0 times
Tommy
3 months ago
Yeah, scheduling the task to align with the users' working hours seems like a practical solution to avoid performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
4 months ago
I think Option B might be more effective. Running the task right before the users start their workday could help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
4 months ago
Option A looks good, but I'm not sure if caching the query results will be enough to handle the performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
5 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Scheduling the query task to align with the users' working hours is a smart move to leverage the warehouse cache.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
3 months ago
Definitely, aligning the task with users' working hours is a smart way to optimize the query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
3 months ago
I agree, it's a practical solution to improve query performance without increasing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
Option B is a good choice. Scheduling the task to run before users start work can help utilize the warehouse cache efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
Definitely, aligning the task with users' working hours is a smart way to optimize the query execution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
4 months ago
I agree, it's a practical solution to improve query performance without increasing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
4 months ago
Option B is a good choice. Scheduling the task to run before users start work can help utilize the warehouse cache efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
An
5 months ago
I see your point, Cora. But I think option C could also be a good choice. The search optimization service might help improve performance without increasing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. Creating a dedicated warehouse seems like a more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
5 months ago
I think option A is the best recommendation. Running the variations of the query before users come in will help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77