Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-R01 Topic 4 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-R01 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 4
[All ARA-R01 Questions]

A company is following the Data Mesh principles, including domain separation, and chose one Snowflake account for its data platform.

An Architect created two data domains to produce two data products. The Architect needs a third data domain that will use both of the data products to create an aggregate data product. The read access to the data products will be granted through a separate role.

Based on the Data Mesh principles, how should the third domain be configured to create the aggregate product if it has been granted the two read roles?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

In the scenario described, where a third data domain needs access to two existing data products in a Snowflake account structured according to Data Mesh principles, the best approach is to utilize Snowflake's Data Exchange functionality. Option D is correct as it facilitates the sharing and governance of data across different domains efficiently and securely. Data Exchange allows domains to publish and subscribe to live data products, enabling real-time data collaboration and access management in a governed manner. This approach is in line with Data Mesh principles, which advocate for decentralized data ownership and architecture, enhancing agility and scalability across the organization. Reference:

Snowflake Documentation on Data Exchange

Articles on Data Mesh Principles in Data Management


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elena
4 months ago
Option A is the way to go! Using secondary roles for all users is a clean and straightforward approach that aligns with the Data Mesh principles.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
4 months ago
D) Request that the two data domains share data using the Data Exchange.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
4 months ago
C) Request a technical ETL user with the sysadmin role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
4 months ago
B) Create a hierarchy between the two read roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
A) Use secondary roles for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joye
5 months ago
Haha, option C is a classic sysadmin move. I can just see the architect pleading for a technical ETL user with sysadmin powers. That's overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
5 months ago
Option D seems like a good choice. Using the Data Exchange to share data between the two domains would be a more secure and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Beatriz
4 months ago
Yes, it aligns with the Data Mesh principles of domain separation while still allowing for collaboration between domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
4 months ago
I agree. It would ensure that the data is shared efficiently and in a controlled manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
4 months ago
Option D seems like a good choice. Using the Data Exchange to share data between the two domains would be a more secure and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
5 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. Creating a hierarchy between the two read roles would allow the third domain to access both data products efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
Sarina
4 months ago
Yes, creating a hierarchy between the two read roles would simplify access to the data products for the third domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
5 months ago
I think requesting a technical ETL user with the sysadmin role would be the best option for configuring the third domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating a hierarchy between the two read roles would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
5 months ago
I think the third domain should be configured to use secondary roles for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77