Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam DEA-C01 Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's DEA-C01 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All DEA-C01 Questions]

A Data Engineer is working on a continuous data pipeline which receives data from Amazon Kinesis Firehose and loads the data into a staging table which will later be used in the data transformation process The average file size is 300-500 MB.

The Engineer needs to ensure that Snowpipe is performant while minimizing costs.

How can this be achieved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This option is the best way to ensure that Snowpipe is performant while minimizing costs. By splitting the files before loading them, the Data Engineer can reduce the size of each file and increase the parallelism of loading. By setting the SIZE_LIMIT option to 250 MB, the Data Engineer can specify the maximum file size that can be loaded by Snowpipe, which can prevent performance degradation or errors due to large files. The other options are not optimal because:

Increasing the size of the virtual warehouse used by Snowpipe will increase the performance but also increase the costs, as larger warehouses consume more credits per hour.

Changing the file compression size and increasing the frequency of the Snowpipe loads will not have much impact on performance or costs, as Snowpipe already supports various compression formats and automatically loads files as soon as they are detected in the stage.

Decreasing the buffer size to trigger delivery of files sized between 100 to 250 MB in Kinesis Firehose will not affect Snowpipe performance or costs, as Snowpipe does not depend on Kinesis Firehose buffer size but rather on its own SIZE_LIMIT option.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lashandra
2 months ago
This question is a piece of cake! Option B is the clear winner. Splitting those files will keep Snowpipe happy and your wallet full.
upvoted 0 times
Josefa
1 months ago
User 3: Splitting the files and setting the SIZE_LIMIT option sounds like the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
1 months ago
I agree, keeping the file size under control is key for performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
2 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Splitting those files will make Snowpipe happy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
Option D sounds like it could introduce more complexity than necessary. Simple file splitting is the way to go, in my view.
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 months ago
True, it's important to find the right balance between performance and cost when working with large data pipelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
1 months ago
Maybe increasing the frequency of Snowpipe loads could also help in keeping the pipeline performant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
2 months ago
I agree, keeping the file size smaller will make the processing more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Splitting the files will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
3 months ago
Option C is interesting, but I'm not sure adjusting the compression and frequency is the best approach here. I'd go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 months ago
Exactly, it's all about finding the right balance between performance and cost efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
2 months ago
Increasing the virtual warehouse size might not be necessary if we can optimize the file sizes before loading them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
2 months ago
I agree, that way the files are more manageable and it can improve performance while reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Splitting the files and setting the size limit will help optimize Snowpipe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ilene
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more cost-effective. Changing the file compression size can improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
3 months ago
I agree with Ilene. Increasing the frequency of Snowpipe loads can help maintain performance while minimizing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Splitting the files will help optimize Snowpipe performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
3 months ago
Increasing the warehouse size? Nah, that's overkill. Option B is the most cost-effective solution, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Daren
2 months ago
I agree, increasing the warehouse size seems unnecessary. Option B is a more cost-effective solution for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
3 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go. Splitting the files and setting the SIZE_LIMIT will help optimize Snowpipe performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
3 months ago
Hmm, option B seems like the way to go. Split those hefty files and keep Snowpipe running smoothly!
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
2 months ago
Yeah, that's a smart way to optimize Snowpipe and make sure it's cost-effective too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Splitting the files will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 months ago
Yeah, that's a smart way to optimize Snowpipe and make sure it's cost-effective too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. Splitting the files will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77