Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam DEA-C01 Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's DEA-C01 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 5
[All DEA-C01 Questions]

A CSV file around 1 TB in size is generated daily on an on-premise server A corresponding table. Internal stage, and file format have already been created in Snowflake to facilitate the data loading process

How can the process of bringing the CSV file into Snowflake be automated using the LEAST amount of operational overhead?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

This option is the best way to automate the process of bringing the CSV file into Snowflake with the least amount of operational overhead. SnowSQL is a command-line tool that can be used to execute SQL statements and scripts on Snowflake. By scheduling a SQL file that executes a PUT command, the CSV file can be pushed from the on-premise server to the internal stage in Snowflake. Then, by creating a pipe that runs a COPY INTO statement that references the internal stage, Snowpipe can automatically load the file from the internal stage into the table when it detects a new file in the stage. This way, there is no need to manually start or monitor a virtual warehouse or task.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ruthann
2 months ago
Wait, a 1 TB CSV file? That's a lot of data! I hope whoever came up with this question has a lot of free time on their hands. Maybe they should use a file compression tool or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 months ago
Option A is a solid choice, but I wonder if it might be prone to delays or missed loads if the file is still being generated when the task runs. Snowpipe in option C might be a bit more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
10 days ago
Yes, Snowpipe seems like the best option for automating the process with minimal operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
14 days ago
I agree, Snowpipe would automatically load the file when it lands in the internal stage, reducing the risk of delays or missed loads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
22 days ago
Snowpipe in option C might be a bit more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
1 months ago
Option A is a solid choice, but I wonder if it might be prone to delays or missed loads if the file is still being generated when the task runs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if it would be the 'least amount of operational overhead' as the question asks. Bypassing the internal stage might introduce some complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Felice
1 months ago
C: Option C also sounds like a good option with the auto-ingest feature of Snowpipe to automatically load the file from the internal stage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
2 months ago
B: I agree, using a task in Snowflake to copy the newest file from the on-premise server into the table seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
2 months ago
A: Option A seems like the best choice for automating the process with the least amount of operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonda
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think option B could also work well. Scheduling a SQL file to run using SnowSQL and then creating a task in Snowflake seems like a good approach too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
2 months ago
I'd go with option B. Scheduling a SQL file to push the file to the internal stage and then running a copy into statement in a Snowflake task seems like a straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
2 months ago
Definitely, setting up the task in Snowflake to run after the file is pushed to the internal stage is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
2 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to automate the process with the least amount of operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
2 months ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. It's a simple process to schedule the SQL file and run the copy into statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Suzan
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the better choice. Using Snowpipe auto-ingest to automatically load the file seems more efficient and less manual intervention required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
3 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It seems like the most straightforward way to automate the process with the least amount of operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
3 months ago
Option C seems the most efficient way to automate the process. Snowpipe will take care of the loading when the file lands in the internal stage, reducing operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
2 months ago
I agree, Snowpipe definitely simplifies the process and reduces the manual steps needed for loading the data into Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
2 months ago
Option C seems the most efficient way to automate the process. Snowpipe will take care of the loading when the file lands in the internal stage, reducing operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77