Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam DSA-C02 Topic 4 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's DSA-C02 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 4
[All DSA-C02 Questions]

Which of the following metrics are used to evaluate classification models?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Evaluation metrics are tied to machine learning tasks. There are different metrics for the tasks of classification and regression. Some metrics, like precision-recall, are useful for multiple tasks. Classification and regression are examples of supervised learning, which constitutes a majority of machine learning applications. Using different metrics for performance evaluation, we should be able to im-prove our model's overall predictive power before we roll it out for production on unseen data. Without doing a proper evaluation of the Machine Learning model by using different evaluation metrics, and only depending on accuracy, can lead to a problem when the respective model is deployed on unseen data and may end in poor predictions.

Classification metrics are evaluation measures used to assess the performance of a classification model. Common metrics include accuracy (proportion of correct predictions), precision (true positives over total predicted positives), recall (true positives over total actual positives), F1 score (har-monic mean of precision and recall), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

Confusion Matrix

Confusion Matrix is a performance measurement for the machine learning classification problems where the output can be two or more classes. It is a table with combinations of predicted and actual values.

It is extremely useful for measuring the Recall, Precision, Accuracy, and AUC-ROC curves.

The four commonly used metrics for evaluating classifier performance are:

1. Accuracy: The proportion of correct predictions out of the total predictions.

2. Precision: The proportion of true positive predictions out of the total positive predictions (precision = true positives / (true positives + false positives)).

3. Recall (Sensitivity or True Positive Rate): The proportion of true positive predictions out of the total actual positive instances (recall = true positives / (true positives + false negatives)).

4. F1 Score: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balance between the two metrics (F1 score = 2 * ((precision * recall) / (precision + recall))).

These metrics help assess the classifier's effectiveness in correctly classifying instances of different classes.

Understanding how well a machine learning model will perform on unseen data is the main purpose behind working with these evaluation metrics. Metrics like accuracy, precision, recall are good ways to evaluate classification models for balanced datasets, but if the data is imbalanced then other methods like ROC/AUC perform better in evaluating the model performance.

ROC curve isn't just a single number but it's a whole curve that provides nuanced details about the behavior of the classifier. It is also hard to quickly compare many ROC curves to each other.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Junita
2 months ago
Seriously, if you're not using all of these metrics, you're doing it wrong. It's like trying to play a video game with your eyes closed - you're just gonna crash and burn.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
2 months ago
The area under the ROC curve is like the superstar of classification model evaluation. It's the prom king of metrics, everyone wants to be it.
upvoted 0 times
Xochitl
1 months ago
Confusion matrix is also a key metric to consider when evaluating classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 months ago
I think the F1 score is also crucial for evaluating classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
I agree, the area under the ROC curve is definitely important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
2 months ago
All of the above are essential for a thorough evaluation. You can't just look at one metric and call it a day. It's like baking a cake - you need all the right ingredients to make it delicious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 months ago
I agree, the F1 score is a great metric to look at too. It's a nice balance between precision and recall, which is super important for classification tasks.
upvoted 0 times
Theron
1 months ago
D) All of the above
upvoted 0 times
...
Willetta
2 months ago
C) Confusion matrix
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
2 months ago
B) F1 score
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
2 months ago
A) Area under the ROC curve
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
2 months ago
I believe the area under the ROC curve is a key metric for evaluating classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
3 months ago
I agree with Shizue, the F1 score and confusion matrix are important too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
3 months ago
The confusion matrix is definitely a must-have tool for evaluating classification models. It's like a cheat sheet for understanding the performance of your model.
upvoted 0 times
Melinda
2 months ago
I agree, it gives a clear picture of how well the model is performing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
2 months ago
Confusion matrix is so helpful in evaluating classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shizue
3 months ago
I think all of the above metrics are used to evaluate classification models.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77