Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'd say views and tables are the safe bets, but I'm also intrigued by materialized views. Maybe Snowflake is trying to test our understanding of different data structures. As for 'future grants,' I'm just going to pretend I didn't see that option.
Alright, let's do this! I'm going with views and tables. Those are the obvious choices. Materialized views are a bit of a stretch, and 'future grants'? I don't know, that's just weird.
I'm pretty sure Dynamic Data Masking is about obfuscating sensitive data, so views and tables are definitely the way to go. Materialized views could be included since they're essentially cached tables, but 'future grants'? That's just confusing the issue.
Okay, let's think this through. Views and tables make sense, since they hold the actual data. External tables, maybe they're trying to test our knowledge of Snowflake's different data sources. But 'future grants'? That one's throwing me off.
Hmm, I'm guessing it has something to do with Snowflake and data security. Let's see, views and tables seem like logical choices, but materialized views? What's that all about?
Donte
6 months agoMargret
7 months agoLetha
7 months agoPercy
7 months agoHelga
8 months agoLizbeth
8 months agoGary
8 months agoNatalie
8 months agoMona
8 months agoIndia
7 months agoRosita
7 months agoLaurel
8 months ago