Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SolarWinds Exam SCP-NPM Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for SolarWinds's SCP-NPM exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All SCP-NPM Questions]

Your network has critical devices on the opposite side of a WAN link from you SolarWinds server. You do not want alerts about the devices if the router (name = ''target'') that connects your SolarWinds server to the remote site is down. How do you configure Alert Suppression?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carolynn
7 months ago
I think C might be the right one because it mentions 'Interface Status is equal to 'Down''.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
7 months ago
But A says 'Interface Status is equal to 'Warning'', which makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
7 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
8 months ago
Good point. I think option D might be the best choice here. Suppressing the alert when the Node Name is 'target' and the Node Status is 'Down' would cover both scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about option C. What if the router is up, but the critical devices on the other side are down? Wouldn't we still want to get an alert for that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
8 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the SolarWinds server sending out a flood of alerts every time the router goes down. We need to put a stop to that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option C. Suppressing the alert when the Node Name is 'target' and the Interface Status is 'Down' seems like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
Carylon
7 months ago
Yeah, that combination ensures we only suppress alerts when the critical router is actually down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
7 months ago
I think option C makes sense too. Node Name and Interface Status are key factors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
8 months ago
I agree. We don't want to suppress alerts when the router is down, but we also don't want to get alerts about the critical devices on the other side of the WAN link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
8 months ago
This is a tricky question. We need to think carefully about the conditions that would trigger the alert suppression.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77