Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SolarWinds Exam SCP-NPM Topic 11 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for SolarWinds's SCP-NPM exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 11
[All SCP-NPM Questions]

Your network has critical devices on the opposite side of a WAN link from you SolarWinds server. You do not want alerts about the devices if the router (name = ''target'') that connects your SolarWinds server to the remote site is down. How do you configure Alert Suppression?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Daniela at Jul 14, 2024, 05:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCP-NPM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dustin
4 months ago
Option C, for sure. Keeping those critical devices off the radar when the router's not cooperating? Genius move, if you ask me. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Maryanne
3 months ago
Julianna: Exactly! It's all about efficiency and prioritizing the most critical alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
Agreed. Alert suppression helps in maintaining a clear view of the network's health.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
3 months ago
Definitely! It's important to filter out unnecessary alerts to focus on the real issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
4 months ago
Option C, for sure. Keeping those critical devices off the radar when the router's not cooperating? Genius move, if you ask me. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
5 months ago
Exactly, that's why I chose option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
5 months ago
Alright, time to put on my network troubleshooting hat. I'd say C is the winner here. Who needs alerts when the router's in the dumps, am I right? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Salome
4 months ago
C it is! Let's keep those alerts in check when the router is acting up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
4 months ago
Definitely, C is the way to go. Don't want to be bombarded with alerts when the router is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
4 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best option. No need for unnecessary alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
5 months ago
I think Alline is right, we should suppress alerts for Interface Status being down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
But if the router is down, shouldn't we suppress alerts for Node Status being down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
5 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with D. Seems like the most comprehensive approach to suppress alerts when the target node is down. Straight to the point, no fuss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
5 months ago
Option C is the way to go, keep those alerts at bay when the router's down. Gotta love that Interface Status = 'Down' condition!
upvoted 0 times
Truman
4 months ago
Yeah, having the Interface Status set to 'Down' is a great way to ensure we only get alerts when necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
4 months ago
I agree, Option C is definitely the best choice to suppress alerts when the router is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77