Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1001 Topic 8 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1001 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 8
[All SPLK-1001 Questions]

How are the results of the following search sorted?

... | sort action, ---file, +bytes

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Using a minus sign (-) for descending order and a plus sign (+) for ascending order. If no sign is specified, the default order is ascending.

Sorting by multiple fields in the order they are specified. If there are duplicate values in one field, the next field is used to break the tie.

Sorting by field values according to their types. If the field type is not specified, the sort command tries to automatically determine it.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leontine
2 months ago
Ooh, this one's tricky. I bet the answer involves some fancy sorting magic!
upvoted 0 times
Lai
20 days ago
Yeah, A seems like the most reasonable choice based on the search criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
24 days ago
I think it's A too, that sounds like the most logical sorting order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 months ago
A) In descending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
2 months ago
Wait, does the order of the options matter? I'm getting a bit mixed up here.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
1 months ago
Got it, thanks for clarifying!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 months ago
B) In ascending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 months ago
No, the order of the options does not matter. Just focus on the search results sorting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
A) In descending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe it could be in descending order by action if it exists. If not, then in descending order by file, and if both action and file do not exist, by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
2 months ago
I believe it's actually in ascending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
3 months ago
I think the results are sorted in descending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
3 months ago
Okay, let's see... I think it's C. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
3 months ago
Hmm, the order seems a bit confusing. I'll have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Nydia
1 months ago
I see where you're coming from, but I think it's actually in descending order by action if it exists. If not, then in descending order by file, and if both action and file do not exist, by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 months ago
I believe it's in ascending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's a bit complex, but it's important to understand the sorting order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 months ago
I think it's sorted in descending order by action, then descending order by file, and lastly by ascending order of bytes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77