Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-1002 Topic 8 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-1002 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 8
[All SPLK-1002 Questions]

How could the following syntax for the chart command be rewritten to remove the OTHER category? (select all that apply)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

In Splunk, when using the chart command, the useother parameter can be set to false (f) to remove the 'OTHER' category, which is a bucket that Splunk uses to aggregate low-cardinality groups into a single group to simplify visualization. Here's how the options break down:

A) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action useother=f This command correctly sets the useother parameter to false, which would prevent the 'OTHER' category from being displayed in the resulting visualization.

B) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action usenull=f useother=t This command has useother set to true (t), which means the 'OTHER' category would still be included, so this is not a correct option.

C) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit=10 useother=f Similar to option A, this command also sets useother to false, additionally imposing a limit to the top 10 results, which is a way to control the granularity of the chart but also to remove the 'OTHER' category.

D) | chart count over CurrentStanding by Action limit-10 This command has a syntax error (limit-10 should be limit=10) and does not include the useother=f clause. Therefore, it would not remove the 'OTHER' category, making it incorrect.

The correct answers to rewrite the syntax to remove the 'OTHER' category are options A and C, which explicitly set useother=f.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Osvaldo
5 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Maybe we should try both approaches in the exam to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
5 months ago
I'm not sure about the correct answer, but I think both A and B could potentially work to remove the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B. We should use usenull-f and useother-t to remove the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
5 months ago
I think the answer is A. We should use useother=f to remove the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
5 months ago
I think option D is incorrect because it has a syntax error with limit-10 instead of limit=10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
6 months ago
I still think option B is the best because it explicitly mentions removing the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
6 months ago
I see your point, Option C does seem like a valid choice as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C could also work with useother=f and limit=10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is better because it has both useother-t and usenull-f to remove the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
7 months ago
I think option A is correct because it has useother=f to remove the OTHER category.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77