Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Splunk Exam SPLK-3002 Topic 8 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-3002 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 8
[All SPLK-3002 Questions]

When troubleshooting KPI search performance, which search names in job activity identify base searches?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In the context of troubleshooting KPI search performance in Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI), the search names in the job activity that identify base searches typically follow the pattern 'Indicator - Shared - xxxx - ITSI Search.' These base searches are fundamental components of the KPI calculation process, aggregating and preparing data for further analysis by KPIs. Identifying these base searches in the job activity is crucial for diagnosing performance issues, as these searches can be resource-intensive and impact overall system performance. Understanding the naming convention helps administrators and analysts quickly pinpoint the base searches related to specific KPIs, facilitating more effective troubleshooting and optimization of search performance within the ITSI environment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Tiara, A) seems to be the most logical choice for troubleshooting KPI search performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
But the rationale behind A) is that it specifically mentions 'Base Search'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Indicator - Base - xxxx - ITSI Search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Indicator - XXXX - Base Search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I'm no search expert, but I've got a feeling option A is the way to go. 'Indicator - XXXX - Base Search' just sounds like it makes the most sense. Let's see if I can crack the code!
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 months ago
User 4: Sounds good, let's give it a try and see if it makes a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 months ago
User 3: I agree, let's go with option A and see if it helps with the search performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 months ago
Yeah, 'Indicator - XXXX - Base Search' sounds like it could be the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
3 months ago
Base searches, huh? I bet the developers were laughing their heads off when they came up with these options. I'll go with B, 'Indicator - Shared - xxxx - ITSI Search', just to keep them on their toes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I'm leaning towards D, 'Indicator - Base - XXXX - Shared Search'. Gotta love those cryptic search names, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Lauryn
2 months ago
Let's go with D, 'Indicator - Base - XXXX - Shared Search'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
2 months ago
I agree with you, D does sound like a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
I'm going with C, 'Indicator - Base - xxxx - ITSI Search'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
2 months ago
I think it might be A, 'Indicator - XXXX - Base Search'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruthann
3 months ago
Oh, this one's tricky! I'm gonna go with C, 'Indicator - Base - xxxx - ITSI Search'. Seems like the most straightforward answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
Magdalene
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards D, 'Indicator - Base - XXXX - Shared Search'. It seems like it could be the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I think I'll go with A, 'Indicator - XXXX - Base Search'. It sounds like it could be the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77