Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OG0-091 Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OG0-091 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All OG0-091 Questions]

During a TOGAF ADM cycle, an architecture is denoted as Version 1.0. What does this indicate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annmarie
2 months ago
Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
upvoted 0 times
Jacquelyne
18 days ago
Totally, anything less than that wouldn't meet the standards for TOGAF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
19 days ago
Yeah, Version 1.0 should definitely be a formally reviewed, detailed architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
21 days ago
I agree, D seems like the most appropriate option for a TOGAF architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marshall
2 months ago
D all the way, baby! Version 1.0 has got to be the real deal, not some half-baked draft. Gotta love that attention to detail in TOGAF!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
1 months ago
User 4: I'm going with D too, it seems like the most logical option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, that makes sense. D seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 months ago
I agree, I'll go with D for a formally reviewed, detailed architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
2 months ago
I think it's either B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernestine
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be a high-level outline architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
I agree with Ozell, Version 1.0 usually means it has gone through a review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
3 months ago
I think it indicates a formally reviewed, preliminary architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
3 months ago
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
3 months ago
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
1 months ago
D: I agree with C. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
C: I'm going with D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
B: I think it's E. A preliminary outline architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
A: I believe it's B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77