Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-103 Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect to an international supplier of

engineering services and automated manufacturing systems. It has three manufacturing plants

where it assembles both standard and customized products for industrial production

automation. Each of these plants has been operating its own planning and production

scheduling systems, as well as applications and control systems that drive the automated

production line.

The Enterprise Architecture department has been operating for several years and has mature,

well-developed architecture governance and development processes that are based on the

TOGAF Standard. The CIO sponsors the Enterprise Architecture.

During a recent management meeting, a senior Vice-President highlighted an interview where

a competitor company's CIO is reported as saying that their production efficiency had been

improved by replacing multiple planning and scheduling systems with a common Enterprise

Resource Planning (ERP) system located in a central data center. Some discussion followed,

with the CIO responding that the situations are not comparable, and the current architecture is

already optimized.

In response, the Architecture Board approved a Request for Architecture Work covering the

investigations to determine if such an architecture transformation would lead to improvements

in efficiency. You have been assigned to support the architecture team working on this project.

A well-known concern of the plant managers is about the security and reliability of driving their

planning and production scheduling from a remote centralized system. Any chosen system

would also need to support the current supply chain network consisting of local partners at

each of the plants.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to explain how you will initiate the architecture project.

Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best answer is C. You would hold a series of interviews at each of the manufacturing plants using the business scenarios technique. This will allow you to understand the systems and integrations with local partners. You would use stakeholder analysis to identify key players in the engagement, and to understand their concerns. You will then identify and document the key high-level stakeholder requirements for the architecture. You will then generate high level definitions of the baseline and target architectures.

This answer is based on the TOGAF standard, which recommends the following steps to initiate the architecture project1:

Establish the architecture project

Identify stakeholders, concerns, and business requirements

Confirm and elaborate business goals, business drivers, and constraints

Evaluate business capabilities

Assess readiness for business transformation

Define scope

Confirm and elaborate Architecture Principles, including business principles

Develop Architecture Vision

Define the Target Architecture value propositions and KPIs

Identify the business transformation risks and mitigation activities

Secure stakeholder and sponsor approval

The answer C covers most of these steps, by using the business scenarios technique to elicit and validate the business requirements, goals, drivers, and constraints, as well as the current and future states of the architecture2. The answer C also uses stakeholder analysis to identify and engage the key stakeholders, and to address their concerns and expectations3. The answer C also generates high level definitions of the baseline and target architectures, which can be used to develop the Architecture Vision and the value propositions4.

The other answers are not the best approach for architecture development, because:

Answer A focuses on researching vendor literature and conducting briefings with vendors, which is not the best way to understand the business needs and the current situation of the enterprise. Answer A also defines a preliminary Architecture Vision without involving the stakeholders or validating the requirements, which may lead to misalignment and lack of consensus.

Answer B conducts a pilot project that will enable vendors to demonstrate potential solutions, which is premature and costly at this stage of the architecture project. Answer B also does not address the stakeholder concerns or the current systems and integrations, which may result in gaps and risks. Answer B also develops the requirements after the pilot project, which may not reflect the actual business needs and goals.

Answer D develops baseline and target architectures for each of the manufacturing plants, which may not consider the enterprise-wide perspective and the potential benefits of a common ERP system. Answer D also does not involve the stakeholders or address their concerns, which may result in resistance and conflict. Answer D also does not define the business case or the performance metrics, which are essential for demonstrating the value and feasibility of the architecture.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dorothy
6 months ago
Candidate 6: Identifying key stakeholder requirements and developing baseline and target architectures is crucial to ensure the architecture meets the business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
7 months ago
Candidate 5: I think holding interviews at each manufacturing plant using the business scenarios technique is essential to understand the systems and integrations with local partners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
7 months ago
Candidate 4: Running a pilot project can also help in developing a complete set of requirements for the architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
7 months ago
Candidate 3: I believe conducting a pilot project to demonstrate off-the-shelf solutions is more practical, as it will save time and money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
7 months ago
Candidate 2: I agree, building consensus among key stakeholders is crucial in starting the architecture project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
7 months ago
Candidate 1: I think the best approach is to research vendor literature and conduct briefings with vendors to define a preliminary Architecture Vision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
8 months ago
Agreed. I think option D is also worth considering, but it might be a bit too heavy-handed for the initial phase. Let's focus on getting a good foundation first before diving into the full architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
8 months ago
I'm not sure about option B, though. Running a pilot project might be a good idea, but I'm not convinced it's the best way to start. Shouldn't we get a solid understanding of the baseline first?
upvoted 0 times
Tonette
6 months ago
User 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
7 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
7 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
7 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martina
8 months ago
That's a good point. And I like how option C also mentions doing a stakeholder analysis to understand the key players. That's crucial for building consensus and buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Exactly! We need to make sure we address those concerns head-on. I'm leaning towards option C - the business scenarios technique sounds like a great way to get a deep understanding of the current state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
8 months ago
I agree, this is a complex situation. But I think the key is to really understand the stakeholder concerns, especially around security and reliability of the centralized system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
8 months ago
Wow, this is a pretty comprehensive scenario. I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed, to be honest. There's a lot of information to unpack here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77