Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-103 Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

You are working as an Enterprise Architect within the Enterprise Architecture (EA) team at a healthcare and life sciences company. The EA team is developing a secure system for researchers to share clinical trial information easily across the organization and with external partners.

Due to the highly sensitive nature of the information, each architecture domain must consider privacy and safety concerns. The healthcare division has been directed to minimize disruptions to clinical trials while introducing the new system gradually.

How would you identify the work packages for introducing the new system? Based on the TOGAF standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In the TOGAF framework, understanding and addressing stakeholder concerns is crucial, particularly for complex projects with high stakes like the AI-first initiative described in the scenario. This approach aligns well with TOGAF's ADM (Architecture Development Method) and its emphasis on effective stakeholder management and risk assessment. Here's why this is the best course of action:

Stakeholder Analysis and Documentation: Conducting a stakeholder analysis is foundational in the early stages of any TOGAF project, particularly during the Preliminary and Architecture Vision phases. This process involves identifying the different stakeholders, understanding their positions, documenting their concerns, and considering any cultural factors that might influence their perspective on the AI-first initiative. Given the diverse concerns raised (such as job security, skill requirements, and cybersecurity), it's essential to have a clear understanding of each stakeholder group's priorities and fears.

Recording Concerns in the Architecture Vision Document: The Architecture Vision phase in TOGAF focuses on defining the high-level scope and objectives of the architecture project. By documenting stakeholder concerns and the corresponding views in the Architecture Vision document, the EA team ensures that these concerns are transparently acknowledged and addressed as part of the strategic direction. This step not only aligns with TOGAF best practices but also helps in building stakeholder buy-in and trust.

Architecture Requirements Specification and Risk Management: Risk management is a key aspect of TOGAF's ADM, particularly in the Requirements Management and Implementation Governance phases. Documenting the requirements for addressing specific risks in the Architecture Requirements Specification provides a structured way to ensure that identified risks are acknowledged and managed throughout the transformation. Regular assessments and feedback loops ensure ongoing alignment and adaptability to emerging risks, which is particularly important given the dynamic nature of AI and its associated challenges.

Alignment with TOGAF ADM Phases: This approach follows the prescribed flow of TOGAF's ADM, starting with stakeholder engagement in the Preliminary and Architecture Vision phases and progressing to risk assessment in the Requirements Management phase. By maintaining a focus on stakeholder needs and formalizing these into architecture requirements, the EA team can ensure that the architecture not only meets business objectives but also mitigates stakeholder concerns.

TOGAF Reference on Stakeholder Management Techniques: TOGAF places significant emphasis on managing stakeholder concerns through its stakeholder management techniques, which highlight the need to systematically identify, analyze, and address the concerns of all involved parties. This practice helps ensure that the architecture is viable and accepted across the organization.

By conducting a thorough stakeholder analysis and integrating the findings into both the Architecture Vision and the Architecture Requirements Specification, the EA team can proactively address stakeholder concerns, manage risks, and align the AI-first initiative with the agency's strategic objectives. This approach is consistent with TOGAF's guidance and provides a structured framework for addressing both business and technical challenges in the context of an AI-first transformation.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dortha
1 months ago
Whoa, this is a lot of TOGAF jargon! I'm just going to go with Option D and hope for the best. At least it involves an Implementation Factor Catalog, which sounds kinda fun.
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
7 days ago
User 3: I agree, let's go with Option D and see how it goes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like a good choice. Let's hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
22 days ago
User 1: I think Option D is the way to go. It involves an Implementation Factor Catalog.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
1 months ago
I like the idea of using a CRUD matrix to rank and select the work packages in Option B. It's a practical and cost-effective way to approach the implementation.
upvoted 0 times
Quinn
23 hours ago
It's crucial to consider the financial aspect when implementing new systems, especially in a healthcare setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
4 days ago
I agree, using a CRUD matrix can help us make informed decisions on which work packages to focus on first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
29 days ago
Option B sounds like a good approach. It's important to prioritize cost-effective solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
1 months ago
I agree with Helaine, using a Consolidated Gaps, Solutions, and Dependencies Matrix seems like the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
2 months ago
Option C seems to be the most comprehensive approach to identifying the work packages. The Consolidated Gaps, Solutions, and Dependencies Matrix is a great way to organize the information, and grouping the solutions into Capability Increments ensures a structured rollout.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
1 months ago
It's important to have a structured approach when introducing a new system, especially in a healthcare setting where data security is crucial. Option C sounds like the right way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 months ago
I agree, using a matrix to classify solutions and grouping them into work packages can help in managing dependencies and ensuring a smooth implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
1 months ago
Option C seems to be the most comprehensive approach to identifying the work packages. The Consolidated Gaps, Solutions, and Dependencies Matrix is a great way to organize the information, and grouping the solutions into Capability Increments ensures a structured rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77