Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-10B Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-10B exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All OGEA-10B Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are serving as the Lead Architect for an Enterprise Architecture team within a leading multinational biotechnology company. The company works in three major industries, including healthcare, crop production, and agriculture. Your team works within the healthcare division.

The healthcare division is developing a new vaccine, and has to demonstrate its effectiveness and safety in a set of clinical trials that satisfy the regulatory requirements of the relevant health authorities. The clinical trials are undertaken by its research laboratories at multiple facilities worldwide. In addition to internal research and development activities, the healthcare division is also involved in publicly funded collaborative research projects with industrial and academic partners.

The Enterprise Architecture team has been engaged in an architecture project to develop a secure system that will allow the healthcare researchers to share information more easily about their clinical trials, and work more collaboratively across the organization and also with its partners. This system will also connect with external partners.

The Enterprise Architecture team uses the TOGAF ADM with extensions required to support healthcare manufacturing practices and laboratory practices. Due to the highly sensitive nature of the information that is managed, special care has been taken to ensure that each architecture domain considers the security and privacy issues that are relevant.

The Vice President for Worldwide Clinical Research is the sponsor of the Enterprise Architecture activity. She has stated that disruptions must be minimized for the clinical trials, and that the rollout must be undertaken incrementally.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to recommend the approach to identify the work packages for an incremental rollout meeting the requirements.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix is a technique that can be used to create work packages for an incremental rollout of the architecture. A work package is a set of actions or tasks that are required to implement a specific part of the architecture. A work package can be associated with one or more Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) or Solution Building Blocks (SBBs), which are reusable components of business, IT, or architectural capability. A work package can also be associated with one or more Capability Increments, which are defined, discrete portions of the overall capability that deliver business value.A Capability Increment can be realized by one or more Transition Architectures, which are intermediate states of the architecture that enable the transition from the Baseline Architecture to the Target Architecture123

The steps for creating work packages using this technique are:

For each gap between the Baseline Architecture and the Target Architecture, identify a proposed solution and classify it as new development, purchased solution, or based on an existing product. A gap is a difference or deficiency in the current state of the architecture that needs to be addressed by the future state of the architecture. A solution is a way of resolving a gap by implementing one or more ABBs or SBBs.

Group similar solutions together to define the work packages. Similar solutions are those that have common characteristics, such as functionality, technology, vendor, or location.

Identify dependencies between work packages, such as logical, temporal, or resource dependencies. Dependencies indicate the order or priority of the work packages, and the constraints or risks that may affect their implementation.

Regroup the work packages into a set of Capability Increments to transition to the Target Architecture. Capability Increments should be defined based on the business value, effort, and risk associated with each work package, and the schedule and objectives of the clinical trials. Capability Increments should also be aligned with the Architecture Vision and the Architecture Principles.

Document the work packages and the Capability Increments in an Architecture Definition Increments Table, which shows the mapping between the work packages, the ABBs, the SBBs, and the Capability Increments. The table also shows the dependencies, assumptions, and issues related to each work package and Capability Increment.

Therefore, the best answer is B, because it describes the approach to identify the work packages for an incremental rollout meeting the requirements, using the Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix as a planning tool.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Chauncey
4 months ago
I hope the clinical trials go better than the last time they tried to develop a vaccine. Remember that whole 'zombie outbreak' incident? Yikes!
upvoted 0 times
Marica
3 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
3 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
4 months ago
Option C seems the most comprehensive approach, covering all the key elements like the Implementation Factor Catalog and Consolidated Gaps Matrix. Just need to make sure the Transition Architectures are well-timed with the clinical trial schedules.
upvoted 0 times
Frederic
3 months ago
C) You recommend that an Implementation Factor Catalog is drawn up to indicate actions and constraints. A Consolidated Gaps. Solutions and Dependencies Matrix should also be created. For each gap. identify a proposed solution and classify it as new development, purchased solution, or based on an existing product. Group similar activities together to form work packages. Identify dependencies between work packages factoring in the clinical trial schedules. Regroup the work packages into a set of Capability Increments scheduled into a series of Transition Architectures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
B) You recommend that a Consolidated Gaps. Solutions and Dependencies Matrix is used as a planning tool for creating work packages. For each gap classify whether the solution is either a new development, purchased solution, or based on an existing product. Group the similar solutions together to define the work packages. Regroup the work packages into a set of Capability Increments to transition to the Target Architecture considering the schedule for clinical trials, and document in an Architecture Definition Increments Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
4 months ago
A) You recommend that the Solution Building Blocks from a Consolidated Gaps, Solutions and Dependencies Matrix be grouped into a set of work packages. Using the matrix as a planning tool, regroup the work packages to account for dependencies. Sequence the work packages into the Capability Increments needed to achieve the Target Architecture, so that the implementation team can schedule the rollout one region at a time to minimize disruption. Document the work packages for the Enterprise Architecture using a Transition Architecture State Evolution Table.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
4 months ago
That's a good point, maybe option A is the way to go after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
4 months ago
But wouldn't regrouping work packages based on dependencies help minimize disruptions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
4 months ago
I prefer option C, creating an Implementation Factor Catalog for actions and constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
4 months ago
I agree with Ocie, grouping work packages based on dependencies seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
4 months ago
I like how the question emphasizes the need to consider security and privacy issues. That's a critical aspect of any healthcare-related system.
upvoted 0 times
Aleshia
4 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
4 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
4 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vi
5 months ago
This looks like a classic case of a TOGAF-based architecture project. The key is to break down the work into incremental, manageable packages that can be rolled out sequentially to minimize disruption.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
4 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
4 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
4 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ocie
5 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77