Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Tibco Exam TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tibco's TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All TCA-Tibco-BusinessWorks Questions]

The application you have created with activation set to Single AppNode is deployed into an AppSpace consisting of two AppNodes (A1 and A2). It is running in managed fault tolerance mode. One of the administrators accidentally stops the application.

What is the expected behavior of your application?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Magnolia
2 months ago
I'm not sure. Maybe the application will be stopped on both A1 and A2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Hey, wait a minute. If the application is running in managed fault tolerance mode, how did the administrator accidentally stop it in the first place? Shouldn't there be, like, a big red button that says 'Do Not Press' or something? This whole scenario sounds a bit sketchy to me.
upvoted 0 times
Catina
1 months ago
Bette: That makes sense. Managed fault tolerance mode should handle it smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
1 months ago
A) The application is stopped on A1, the application will be activated on A2, and processing of requests is automatically taken over by the other AppNode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
Yeah, accidents happen. But what do you think will happen to the application now?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 months ago
Maybe the administrator didn't see the big red button.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darnell
2 months ago
I agree with Karol. The processing of requests should be automatically taken over by the other AppNode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
I'm going to go with C. If the application is in managed fault tolerance mode, it should just go into standby on the other AppNode, right? That way, it's ready to take over if the first AppNode fails completely. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Option D seems more plausible to me. If the application is set to Single AppNode, I would expect it to just stop processing requests on the other AppNode rather than activate it. But what do I know, I'm just a humble exam taker.
upvoted 0 times
Merilyn
1 months ago
Well, in managed fault tolerance mode, it makes sense for the application to switch to the other AppNode for processing requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Option D seems more plausible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the correct choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 months ago
I think the expected behavior is that the application will be activated on A2 and requests will be processed there.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karol
3 months ago
I think the expected behavior is that the application will be activated on A2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
3 months ago
Clearly, the answer is A. The application is designed to run in managed fault tolerance mode, so when one AppNode is stopped, the application will automatically be activated on the other AppNode to ensure continuous processing of requests. No brainer!
upvoted 0 times
Vannessa
2 months ago
Exactly! That's the expected behavior of the application in managed fault tolerance mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
3 months ago
A) The application is stopped on A1, the application will be activated on A2, and processing of requests is automatically taken over by the other AppNode
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77