Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Trend Exam TM1-101 Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's TM1-101 exam

Question #: 90
Topic #: 2

[All TM1-101 Questions]

You have just updated the virus-pattern file and the scan engine in a single deployment action on Server 1, Server 2, and Server 3. The virus-pattern file seems to be causing problems on Server 1, so you decide to use the Rollback feature to revert to the previous version. Which action is possible?

AYou can roll back the virus-pattern file and leave the updated scan engine on Server 1 only. All files on Server 2 and Server 3 would remain updated.

BIf you use the Rollback feature, you must reverse the entire action previously deployed. This means you would roll back the virus-pattern file and the scan engine on all three servers.

CIf you want to roll back the virus-pattern file for one server, you must roll back the virus-pattern files on all three servers. However, you may leave the updated scan engine on all servers.

DIf you roll back the virus-pattern file, you must also roll back the scan engine. However, you may choose to roll back these files on Server 1 only, leaving Server 2 and Server 3 with updated versions.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Nan at Jun 21, 2024, 12:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Talia

5 months ago

I think option C is a good compromise. We can roll back the virus-pattern file on all servers but keep the scan engine updated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

5 months ago

Option D is tempting, but I think that would just create more problems in the long run. Better to go with the safe choice and roll everything back on all servers.

upvoted 0 times

Marylyn

3 months ago

Yeah, option B seems like the best choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edward

3 months ago

I think we should go with option B as well to avoid any further complications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilma

3 months ago

I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

3 months ago

I think rolling back everything on all servers is the most reliable option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

3 months ago

Yeah, option B seems like the best choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

4 months ago

I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Heike

5 months ago

But what if we want to keep the updated scan engine on Server 1? Option D doesn't allow for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

5 months ago

Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question was trying to catch people out with those sneaky options. But option B is the winner for sure!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

5 months ago

I agree with Shawn. The question clearly states that if you use the Rollback feature, you must reverse the entire action previously deployed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

5 months ago

Option B seems the most logical choice here. You can't selectively roll back the virus-pattern file on one server and not the others.

upvoted 0 times

Corinne

4 months ago

Yes, it's better to roll back the entire action to avoid any potential issues with different versions on each server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vi

5 months ago

I agree, option B is the safest choice to ensure consistency across all servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Martha

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is the way to go. We should roll back both files on Server 1 only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

6 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. It allows us to roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1 only.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77