Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Trend Exam TM1-101 Topic 3 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Trend's TM1-101 exam

Question #: 94
Topic #: 3

[All TM1-101 Questions]

You have just updated the virus-pattern file and the scan engine in a single deployment action on Server 1, Server 2, and Server 3. The virus-pattern file seems to be causing problems on Server 1, so you decide to use the Rollback feature to revert to the previous version. Which action is possible?

AYou can roll back the virus-pattern file and leave the updated scan engine on Server 1 only. All files on Server 2 and Server 3 would remain updated.

BIf you use the Rollback feature, you must reverse the entire action previously deployed. This means you would roll back the virus-pattern file and the scan engine on all three servers.

CIf you want to roll back the virus-pattern file for one server, you must roll back the virus-pattern files on all three servers. However, you may leave the updated scan engine on all servers.

DIf you roll back the virus-pattern file, you must also roll back the scan engine. However, you may choose to roll back these files on Server 1 only, leaving Server 2 and Server 3 with updated versions.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Sherell at Aug 08, 2024, 08:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium TM1-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dion

3 months ago

I see both points, but I think option C is the most logical. We can roll back the virus-pattern file on all servers if needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

3 months ago

Haha, someone's got a case of the virus blues on Server 1. Time to hit the 'Undo' button and start fresh!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mireya

3 months ago

This is a classic case of 'all or nothing'. I'd say B is the correct answer. No half-measures here!

upvoted 0 times

Boris

3 months ago

Yeah, better to be safe than sorry. Let's roll back everything on all servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julieta

3 months ago

I agree, B is the safest option. Can't risk leaving any server vulnerable.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Benedict

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is the correct answer. We should roll back both files on Server 1 only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelba

3 months ago

B is the way to go. Gotta be consistent and roll back everything if you're using the Rollback feature.

upvoted 0 times

Freeman

3 months ago

I agree, consistency is key when it comes to rolling back changes. It's better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronny

3 months ago

B is definitely the safest option. We don't want to risk any issues by leaving some servers with different versions.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Catalina

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. It allows us to roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1 only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

3 months ago

I agree with Rupert, option C seems like the most practical solution in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rupert

4 months ago

I see both points, but I think option C makes the most sense. It allows you to roll back the virus-pattern file on one server while leaving the scan engine updated on all servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hildred

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the correct choice as it states you must reverse the entire action on all three servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ozell

4 months ago

I'm going with C. You have to roll back the virus-pattern files across all servers, but you can keep the updated scan engine.

upvoted 0 times

Gracia

2 months ago

Yes, having that flexibility in the rollback process can definitely help in managing any issues that may arise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

2 months ago

It's good to know that we have the option to selectively roll back certain files while leaving others updated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

2 months ago

Agreed, rolling back the virus-pattern files on all servers while keeping the updated scan engine seems like the most efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

3 months ago

I think C is the best option too. It allows us to keep the updated scan engine on all servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Alesia

4 months ago

D sounds like the best option. I can roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1 without affecting the other servers.

upvoted 0 times

Evangelina

4 months ago

Yes, it's great that we have the flexibility to choose which servers to roll back changes on. It helps with troubleshooting and minimizing downtime.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

4 months ago

That's a good point. It's important to be able to revert changes on specific servers without impacting the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlene

4 months ago

D sounds like the best option. I can roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1 without affecting the other servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Marvel

4 months ago

I think option A is possible because it allows you to roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1 only.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

4 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is B. If you use the Rollback feature, you have to revert the entire action, not just parts of it.

upvoted 0 times

Andra

3 months ago

Got it, so it seems like option C would be the best choice in that scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

4 months ago

In that case, we would have to roll back the virus-pattern files on all three servers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brendan

4 months ago

But what if we only want to roll back the virus-pattern file on Server 1?

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

4 months ago

I agree, option B seems to be the correct choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77